2022
DOI: 10.1214/22-ejs2059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagged covariance and cross-covariance operators of processes in Cartesian products of abstract Hilbert spaces

Abstract: A major task in Functional Time Series Analysis is measuring the dependence within and between processes for which lagged covariance and cross-covariance operators have proven to be a practical tool in wellestablished spaces. This article focuses on estimating these operators of processes in Cartesian products of abstract Hilbert spaces. We derive precise asymptotic results for the estimation errors for fixed and increasing lag and Cartesian powers under very mild conditions, presumably even under the mildest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3.1 states explicit upper bounds for the estimation errors for lagged covariance operators of processes in Cartesian products of arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces for any lag h, Cartesian power m and sample size N under L 4 -m-approximability, and thus adds to the existing literature: Under L 4 -m-approximability, Hörmann and Kokoszka (2010) stated upper bounds for covariance operators of processes in L 2 [0, 1], where their upper bound matches ours except for their additional factor √ 2 in the series term; Aue and Klepsch (2017) derived upper bounds for any m, N for covariance operators of processes in Cartesian products defined via linear processes in L 2 [0, 1]; and Kuenzer (2024) mentions asymptotic upper bounds for covariance and specific lagged covariance operators. Moreover, Kühnert (2022) only deduced precise limits for the estimation errors of lagged covariance operators in Cartesian product under a stricter condition.…”
Section: Estimation Of Lagged Covariance Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 3.1 states explicit upper bounds for the estimation errors for lagged covariance operators of processes in Cartesian products of arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces for any lag h, Cartesian power m and sample size N under L 4 -m-approximability, and thus adds to the existing literature: Under L 4 -m-approximability, Hörmann and Kokoszka (2010) stated upper bounds for covariance operators of processes in L 2 [0, 1], where their upper bound matches ours except for their additional factor √ 2 in the series term; Aue and Klepsch (2017) derived upper bounds for any m, N for covariance operators of processes in Cartesian products defined via linear processes in L 2 [0, 1]; and Kuenzer (2024) mentions asymptotic upper bounds for covariance and specific lagged covariance operators. Moreover, Kühnert (2022) only deduced precise limits for the estimation errors of lagged covariance operators in Cartesian product under a stricter condition.…”
Section: Estimation Of Lagged Covariance Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can allow k also to depend on the sample size N. This is needed when estimating operators involving projecting onto a k-dimensional subspace and allowing the number of projections k to go to infinity, see Bosq (2000), Kühnert (2022), Kühnert et al (2024), Kuenzer (2024), to name a few.…”
Section: Consequences For Eigenelementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation