Lagging and Flagging: Air Pollution, Shale Gas Exploration and the Interaction of Policy, Science, Ethics and Environmental Justice in England

Abstract

The science on the effects of global climate change and air pollution on morbidity and mortality is clear and debate now centres around the scale and precise contributions of particular pollutants. Sufficient data existed in recent decades to support the adoption of precautionary public health policies relating to fossil fuels including shale exploration. Yet air quality and related public health impacts linked to ethical and environmental justice elements are often marginalized or missing in planning and associated decision making. Industry and government policies and practices, laws and planning regulations lagged well behind the science in the United Kingdom. This paper explores the reasons for this and what shaped some of those policies. Why did shale gas policies in England fail to fully address public health priorities and neglect ethical and environmental justice concerns. To answer this question, an interdisciplinary analysis is needed informed by a theoretical framework of how air pollution and climate change are largely discounted in the complex realpolitik of policy and regulation for shale gas development in England. Sources, including official government, regulatory and planning documents, as well as industry and scientific publications are examined and benchmarked against the science and ethical and environmental justice criteria. Further, our typology illustrates how the process works drawing on an analysis of official policy documents and statements on planning and regulatory oversight of shale exploration in England, and material from industry and their consultants relating to proposed shale oil and gas development. Currently the oil, gas and chemical industries in England continue to dominate and influence energy and feedstock-related policy making to the detriment of ethical and environmental justice decision making with significant consequences for public health.

Mopping Up or Turning Off the Tap? Environmental Injustice and the Ethics of Plastic Pollution

“…In a collaborative report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and United Nations Environment Programme (2020) they strongly prioritize "elimination of problematic or unnecessary plastic packaging through redesign, innovation, and new delivery models" (19). Watterson and Dinan (2020) in their piece describing the lag of policy behind science in regulating air pollution in England, warn that the dominance of fossil fuel industries in policymaking is detrimental to "ethical and environmental justice decision making with significant consequences for public health (1). The same could be said of plastics regulation.…”

Ethical Climate as Social Norm: Impact on Judgements and Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace

“…There is also a positive relationship between the ethical climate and commitment to work [20,21], trust in the organization [22], decrease corruption [23], and compliance with rules at work [24]. Finally, there is a relationship between the ethical climate and (un)ethical behavior at work or their antecedents [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] or decisions in the face of ethical dilemmas [32] or in the development of pro-environmental behaviors [33,34]. The impact of the ethical climate on behavior is based either on a mediating effect [14], or on a moderating effect.…”

Professionals must refuse to work on new fossil fuel projects

“…Meanwhile, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change calls for urgent, short term climate actions and governance and policy changes to stop new fossil fuel projects 4. More ethically focused debate should be encouraged because research shows that a lack of moral and ethical guidance for the industry has hindered policy, governance, and professional engagement with sustainable approaches to the climate crisis, and climate change concerns continue to be ignored or downplayed 567…”