2007
DOI: 10.2174/1874328500701010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrange Gradient Mask for Optical Image Processing

Abstract: Masks are used in optical image processing. They are used to generate gradient maps. These maps are applicable to the enhancement of feature extraction and edge detection. Lagrange mask is presented in this letter and criteria for the characterizations of mask performance are given. Through an illustration the performance of the presented mask is demonstrated where it is compared to that of Gabor mask. Results from the illustration support the applicability and suitability of Lagrange mask for the generation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This correction dramatically increases the accuracy of both the resulting orientation, φ = tan −1 (dy, dx), and magnitude, r = dx 2 + dy 2 , as calculated based on dx dy = xpos−xneg ypos−yneg in 2D image space, from resulting gradient vector Figure 2 illustrates, this approach has several advantages over conventional Sobel, Gabor and Lagrange gradients [28] in that it is invariant to region size, offers sub-pixel accuracy and has significantly higher noise resistance. Computationally it remains more efficient than Gabor and Lagrange approaches and only marginally more complex than Sobel mask convolution.…”
Section: Gradients From Centroids (Grace)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction dramatically increases the accuracy of both the resulting orientation, φ = tan −1 (dy, dx), and magnitude, r = dx 2 + dy 2 , as calculated based on dx dy = xpos−xneg ypos−yneg in 2D image space, from resulting gradient vector Figure 2 illustrates, this approach has several advantages over conventional Sobel, Gabor and Lagrange gradients [28] in that it is invariant to region size, offers sub-pixel accuracy and has significantly higher noise resistance. Computationally it remains more efficient than Gabor and Lagrange approaches and only marginally more complex than Sobel mask convolution.…”
Section: Gradients From Centroids (Grace)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of Legendre and Lagrange polynomials are the main reasons for the use of this mask. The applicability of the Lagrange mask to image processing is supported through its characterisation using the three criteria of good detection, exact localisation probability, and noise maximum probability [20]. Here, this mask is set to be spectral information and the method given in [12] is used to generate an approximately circularly symmetric 2D Lagrange filter, L. This filter is used for the modification of the complex diffusion coefficient of the method given in [14].…”
Section: Pseudospectral Lagrange Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first modification is a convolutional modification of the coefficient. For this modification, the Lagrange mask discussed in [20] is used to generate an approximately circularly symmetric 2D Lagrange filter using the method provided in [12]. The first modification is then convolving this filter with the coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%