2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-016-0394-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrangian Jacobian Motion Planning: A Parametric Approach

Abstract: This paper addresses the motion planning problem of nonholonomic robotic systems. The system's kinematics are described by a driftless control system with output. It is assumed that the control functions are represented in a parametric form, as truncated orthogonal series. A new motion planning algorithm is proposed based on the solution of a Lagrange-type optimisation problem stated in the linear approximation of the parametrised system. Performance of the algorithm is illustrated by numeric computations for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual control of non-holonomic system suffers from various disturbances, due to the error in the fabrication and assembly of non-holonomic machines, the insufficient resolution of the transmission system, and the uncertain accuracy of the measuring instrument [1,2]. As a result, the actual result of motion control often deviates from the theoretical simulation value, that is, the final configuration of the system does not coincide with the target configuration [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual control of non-holonomic system suffers from various disturbances, due to the error in the fabrication and assembly of non-holonomic machines, the insufficient resolution of the transmission system, and the uncertain accuracy of the measuring instrument [1,2]. As a result, the actual result of motion control often deviates from the theoretical simulation value, that is, the final configuration of the system does not coincide with the target configuration [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%