2002
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0083:lsmico>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lagrangian Stochastic Modeling in Coastal Oceanography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brickman & Smith (2002) identify 2 concerns relating to particle tracking, which they term underseeding problems. Both concerns relate to the number of particles that must be tracked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Brickman & Smith (2002) identify 2 concerns relating to particle tracking, which they term underseeding problems. Both concerns relate to the number of particles that must be tracked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second concern relates to the probability of detecting rare events in a stochastic process. Brickman & Smith (2002) discuss both problems in terms of the relative size of the spawning and nursery areas. If spawning and nursery areas are coincident and large, then only a small number of particles and a few simulations may be needed, because we are trying to estimate the average of a process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7] The statistical certainty of probability distributions computed with Monte Carlo techniques strongly depends on the number of numerical integrations considered in the ensemble [Brickman and Smith, 2002]. Increasing complexity and variability of the drifting field implies a higher number of numerical integrations in the ensemble to get confident results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, hubiera sido útil contar con una descripción de la topografía del dominio de mayor resolución para evaluar que tan apropiado es extrapolar los datos de la estación EMAC a toda el área de simulación. Respecto al número de partículas liberadas en cada condición, hubiera sido deseable una mejor justificación de un número que parece excesivamente bajo, incluso para una descripción cualitativa de la dispersión (ver por ejemplo Brickman & Smith 2002). En suma, la definición de los experimentos numéricos en base a cuyos resultados se pretende poner a prueba la hipótesis de Alvarez et al (2011), resulta incompleta y en varios aspectos dificulta la comprensión de sus resultados.…”
unclassified