1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0380-1330(95)71121-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lake Trout Restoration in the Great Lakes: Stock-Size Criteria for Natural Reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite seemingly adequate numbers of mature lake trout through much of the 1980s and into the early 1990s (Selgeby et al 1995), there were few reports of naturally produced fish except for fry captured on spawning shoals (Casselman 1995;Elrod et al 1995;Krueger et al 1995). Failure of the hatchery-origin fish to reproduce was puzzling because many of the factors thought to contribute to reproductive failure of lake trout in the Great Lakes were relaxed, and ecosystem quality seemed to be improving (Fitzsimons et al 2003).…”
Section: Lake Troutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite seemingly adequate numbers of mature lake trout through much of the 1980s and into the early 1990s (Selgeby et al 1995), there were few reports of naturally produced fish except for fry captured on spawning shoals (Casselman 1995;Elrod et al 1995;Krueger et al 1995). Failure of the hatchery-origin fish to reproduce was puzzling because many of the factors thought to contribute to reproductive failure of lake trout in the Great Lakes were relaxed, and ecosystem quality seemed to be improving (Fitzsimons et al 2003).…”
Section: Lake Troutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake trout restoration research has been focused on identifying impediments to restoration, but a number of key questions remain unanswered. For example, a relative spawner abundance threshold of 50 lake trout /305 m of assessment gill net has been widely used to determine if spawner abundance is sufficient for reproduction (Selgeby et al, 1995), but the actual relationship between catch rates and spawner abundance is unknown because the primary assessment tool has been gill netting. Some reefs in Lake Michigan (including Sheboygan Reef) that have met or exceeded the above catch rate criterion have not exhibited recruitment of naturally spawned lake trout, suggesting additional recruitment bottlenecks are involved (Bronte et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, spawning by contemporary lake trout stocks appears restricted to cobble substrates in relatively shallow (< 15 m) water Wagner 1981;Peck 1986;Fitzsimons 1994aFitzsimons , 1995Casselman 1995;Holey et al 1995;Kelso et al 1995;Schreiner et al 1995). The difference between historic and contemporary accounts may result from incorrectly inferring where spawning occurred.…”
Section: Is There a Need For Artificial Reefs In The Great Lakes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In southern and central Lake Michigan, where cobble substrates are rare nearshore, man-made structures have been the only sites where substantial numbers of lake trout eggs and fry have been collected Wagner 1981;Marsden 1994;Holey et al 1995). In Lakes Superior and Ontario also, studies have indicated that the highest density of lake trout eggs occurs on man-made structures in areas where natural cobble substrates are rare (Marsden 1994;Schreiner et al 1995;Fitzsimons 1995).…”
Section: Is There a Need For Artificial Reefs In The Great Lakes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation