2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lake-wide phytoplankton production and abundance in the Upper Great Lakes: 2010–2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While in situ experiments provided accurate estimates of primary production in small volumes of water, they may not be easily extrapolated to lake-wide estimates [7][8][9]. Moreover, these experiments provide an integrated measure of production that is dependent on many variables (e.g., phytoplankton biomass, light, temperature, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in situ experiments provided accurate estimates of primary production in small volumes of water, they may not be easily extrapolated to lake-wide estimates [7][8][9]. Moreover, these experiments provide an integrated measure of production that is dependent on many variables (e.g., phytoplankton biomass, light, temperature, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, reductions in NPP, phytoplankton, and zooplankton biomass are substantially greater in the nearshore compared to the offshore, producing a sign reversal in the nearshore‐offshore gradient between the prequagga and postquagga lake (i.e., greatest productivity located nearshore in prequagga lake but offshore in postquagga lake). This result has also been observed using satellite remote sensing data [ Fahnenstiel et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are lower than the 2008 value of 9.5 TgC/year estimated by Warner and Lesht [] but close to the 5.0–7.2 TgC/year estimated by Fahnenstiel et al . [] for 2010–2013. Using a 1.4 NPP:GPP conversion factor [ Pilcher et al ., ; Fahnenstiel and Scavia , ] yields a model GPP estimate of 6.6 TgC/year, which falls within the range of Fahnenstiel et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies that use remote sensing to estimate productivity or chlorophyll in large freshwater lentic systems focus on whole lake trends (Fahnenstiel et al, 2016;Feng et al, 2015;Shuchman et al, 2013;Warner and Lesht, 2015;Yousef et al, 2014). However, nearshore zones in many large lentic systems, such as the Great Lakes, may have heterogeneous habitats that differ in primary production due to spatial differences in tributary input, bathymetry, substrate, and other environmental conditions.…”
Section: Geographic Information Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%