2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar convective heat transfer and viscous pressure loss of alumina–water and zirconia–water nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
166
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
166
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement by Ho et al [19] showed that the thermal conductivity of Al 2 O 3 -water nanofluid increased more than 10% relatively with particle volumetric fraction 3%. Their data agreed well with the experimental result by Wang et al [20] and theoretical correlation of Rea et al [21], although their measurement was for low volume fraction and higher than that predicted by Masuda et al [22]. Vajjha and Das [17] performed experiment on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids dispersing Al 2 O 3 or CuO nanoparticles into a base fluid.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The measurement by Ho et al [19] showed that the thermal conductivity of Al 2 O 3 -water nanofluid increased more than 10% relatively with particle volumetric fraction 3%. Their data agreed well with the experimental result by Wang et al [20] and theoretical correlation of Rea et al [21], although their measurement was for low volume fraction and higher than that predicted by Masuda et al [22]. Vajjha and Das [17] performed experiment on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids dispersing Al 2 O 3 or CuO nanoparticles into a base fluid.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They state nanofluids behaved as homogenous mixtures with experimental Nusselt numbers following classical relations developed for the single-phase approach, modified for the mean nano-particle concentration, being accurate to within ±10%; this uncertainty is explained by movement of nanoparticles due to Brownian motion and viscosity gradient due to concentration, with non-uniform shear rate having insignificant effect on heat transfer. Similar uncertainty was found for metal oxide nanofluids [17] and for CNT nano-fluids [9].…”
Section: -Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The second term 1.7 Re/Pr 4 1/3 ϕ in Equation (30) is small compared to 1 in all cases. The results are then well fitted with Equation (29) and so with the correlation provided by Rea et al [35] for Al 2 O 3 /water-based nanofluids, 431 ≤ Re ≤ 2000 and ϕ ≤ 0.06. It corresponds to Equation (29) with a prefactor equal to 2.0398 instead of 1.953.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Two correlations for the thermal conductivity k n f and for the dynamic viscosity µ n f are considered here. The equations used to evaluate the nanofluid properties (density [11], heat capacity [32,33], viscosity [34,35]) are as follows:…”
Section: Water Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%