1995
DOI: 10.1515/revce.1995.11.1.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar Flow in Porous Ducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classic Beavers-Joseph slip condition [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] was originally phrased in terms of the normal derivative of the tangential velocity (i.e., only the first term in square brackets, above), whereas we add the transposed gradient term to make the slip velocity proportional to the wall shear stress-as appears in [27] and [30]. The difference is negligible at macroscopic lengthscales, but becomes significant when the problem is scaled to resolve the (weakly singular) fine structure at the origin.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic Beavers-Joseph slip condition [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] was originally phrased in terms of the normal derivative of the tangential velocity (i.e., only the first term in square brackets, above), whereas we add the transposed gradient term to make the slip velocity proportional to the wall shear stress-as appears in [27] and [30]. The difference is negligible at macroscopic lengthscales, but becomes significant when the problem is scaled to resolve the (weakly singular) fine structure at the origin.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, absent phenomena presumed rare or inconsequential at the subcellular level such as porous boundaries (cf. Chellam, Wiesner & Dawson 1995) or slip boundary conditions (e.g. Allison 1999), the empirically observed nature of the liquid–solid interface dictates imposition of classical no‐slip boundary conditions: along a liquid–solid interface, the velocities of the two phases are equal (e.g.…”
Section: Convection: Mass Flow At Low Reynolds Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 and 19 for no-slip and in Ref. 35 for slip flows. Table II summarizes the initial guesses resulting in the entire set of similar solutions for axisymmetric flow in a channel with two porous walls as proved earlier in Sec.…”
Section: A Discussion Of Results For Flow In a Symmetric Channelmentioning
confidence: 91%