2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar flow of a nanoliquid film over an unsteady stretching sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(a) shows the influence of the Le on the local Sherwood number for U w (x) = x 1+x . It should be noticed that Sc ≈ 1 indicates that (13) and (11) coincide with each other. Similarly if we replace Sc by P r.Le in (13), it represents that relative heat and mass transfer by diffusion is comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2(a) shows the influence of the Le on the local Sherwood number for U w (x) = x 1+x . It should be noticed that Sc ≈ 1 indicates that (13) and (11) coincide with each other. Similarly if we replace Sc by P r.Le in (13), it represents that relative heat and mass transfer by diffusion is comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It should be noticed that Sc ≈ 1 indicates that (13) and (11) coincide with each other. Similarly if we replace Sc by P r.Le in (13), it represents that relative heat and mass transfer by diffusion is comparable. The increase in Le means a larger thermal diffusivity which is a result of higher thermal conductivity or low heat capacity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choi (1995) To the authors' best knowledge, very few studies have thus far been communicated with regard to thin film flow on an unsteady stretching sheet in nanofluids. Narayana and Sibanda (2012) were probably the first to extend the work of Liu and Andersson (2008) to the case of thin nanofluid film. They solved the transformed governing equations by the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg and NewtonRaphson methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%