2013
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar–turbulent transition induced by a discrete roughness element in a supersonic boundary layer

Abstract: The linear instability and breakdown to turbulence induced by an isolated roughness element in a boundary layer at Mach 2.5, over an isothermal flat plate with laminar adiabatic wall temperature, have been analysed by means of direct numerical simulations, aided by spatial BiGlobal and three-dimensional parabolized (PSE-3D) stability analyses. It is important to understand transition in this flow regime since the process can be slower than in incompressible flow and is crucial to prediction of local heat loads… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
10
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N -factor increases with roughness height for both dominant modes leading to a maximum N -factor for the S1 and A1 modes of N max ≈ 7.8 and ≈ 3.6 for k = 150 µm, respectively. Within this work, the symmetric mode always leads to the highest integrated ampli¦cation rate, which is in close agreement to the ¦ndings of [12,24,25,28] for the near ¦eld around the roughness element in a zero pressure gradient §ow. The authors of [12,24,25,28] report that depending on the aspect ratio [25], the symmetric mode is the leading mode at ¦rst and leads to transition in supercritical cases, where the amplitude of the disturbance caused by the roughness element is su©cient to promote turbulence [29].…”
Section: E¨ect Of Roughness Heightsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The N -factor increases with roughness height for both dominant modes leading to a maximum N -factor for the S1 and A1 modes of N max ≈ 7.8 and ≈ 3.6 for k = 150 µm, respectively. Within this work, the symmetric mode always leads to the highest integrated ampli¦cation rate, which is in close agreement to the ¦ndings of [12,24,25,28] for the near ¦eld around the roughness element in a zero pressure gradient §ow. The authors of [12,24,25,28] report that depending on the aspect ratio [25], the symmetric mode is the leading mode at ¦rst and leads to transition in supercritical cases, where the amplitude of the disturbance caused by the roughness element is su©cient to promote turbulence [29].…”
Section: E¨ect Of Roughness Heightsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The spectrum is obtained for the conditions given in [24] for F = 0.08 at x = 93.66: 1 ¡ present results; and 2 ¡ De Tullio et al [24] results from a di¨erent solver, which has been extensively validated [22,23]. Details on the base §ow computations, as well as on the instability characteristics of the wake modes, studied by DNS and an instability solver, are given in [24]. Figure 6 depicts the spatial eigenspectrum obtained for F = 0.08 at x = 93.66.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A validation of the code can be found in the work of De Tullio et al [21]. A grid study relevant for the current problem is presented in Section IV.A of this paper.…”
Section: Iic Code Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asai, Minagawa & Nishioka 2002, Wu & Luo 2003, but there also exists experimental evidence suggesting that streaks generated by roughnesses of suitable form and height may stabilize planar and oblique T-S waves (Fransson et al 2005;Shahinfar, Sattarzadeh & Fransson 2014). The evolution and instability of roughness-induced streaks in supersonic boundary layers have been studied recently; see Kegerise, Owens & Rudolf (2010), Wheaton & Schneider (2012, Choudhari et al (2010Choudhari et al ( , 2013, Iyer et al (2011) andDe Tullio et al (2013). Klebanoff & Tidstrom (1972) carried out the first experimental investigation of physical mechanism causing earlier transition in a boundary layer perturbed by an isolated twodimensional roughness with h * /δ * = 0.7 − 0.8, where δ * is the displacement thickness of the smooth boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%