2013
DOI: 10.1299/kikaib.79.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laminar-Turbulent Transition of an Inlet Boundary Layer in a Circular Pipe Induced by Periodic Injection (Turbulence within Isolated Turbulent Patches and Its Growth Mechanism)

Abstract: The laminar-turbulent transition of a boundary layer induced by a jet injection in the inlet region of a circular pipe was experimentally investigated. The jet was periodically injected radially from a small hole in the inlet region into the pipe flow. Axial velocity was measured by a hot-wire anemometer. The turbulence induced by the jet within the boundary layer developed into turbulent patches which grew in the axial, circumferential and radial directions downstream. Turbulent fluctuations within the patch … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…increased suddenly near the leading edge on the θ = 180° side, the streamline in the non-turbulent region does not enter into the leading edge on the θ = 180° side, figure 6(a). Therefore, characteristic near the leading edge on the θ = 180° side at (xxj)/D = 3.5 does not correspond to that of the turbulent patch at the upstream portions of the inlet region [3]. As the fluctuating region on the θ = 180° side is caused by the crush of the jet to the wall, the patch there does not indicate the characteristic of upstream portions of the inlet region [3].…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…increased suddenly near the leading edge on the θ = 180° side, the streamline in the non-turbulent region does not enter into the leading edge on the θ = 180° side, figure 6(a). Therefore, characteristic near the leading edge on the θ = 180° side at (xxj)/D = 3.5 does not correspond to that of the turbulent patch at the upstream portions of the inlet region [3]. As the fluctuating region on the θ = 180° side is caused by the crush of the jet to the wall, the patch there does not indicate the characteristic of upstream portions of the inlet region [3].…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, characteristic near the leading edge on the θ = 180° side at (xxj)/D = 3.5 does not correspond to that of the turbulent patch at the upstream portions of the inlet region [3]. As the fluctuating region on the θ = 180° side is caused by the crush of the jet to the wall, the patch there does not indicate the characteristic of upstream portions of the inlet region [3]. Contrary to (x-xj)/D = 3.5, the streamlines are flowing into the patch at (x-xj)/D = 9.4 and 14.9, figure 6(b) and (c).…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a long time, there has been interest in various phenomena in fluid science, e.g., visualization and visual output of hot-wires at the instantaneous clear boundary between the turbulent boundary layer and outer laminar region, wall-and free-shear turbulent flows exhibiting "coherent structure" (4) in random environments; and its strong relationship with the Reynolds shear stress is recognized in wall turbulence, turbulent puffs or slugs appearing in transitional circular pipes and turbulent spots in the transitional boundary layer and their boundaries are clear but irregular in time and space (5)(7)~ (9) . This paper concerns identification of the above nature of the turbulence.…”
Section: Overview Of Distinction Between Laminar and Turbulent Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%