“…Studies were considered to be of high quality for this review if they fulfilled three of the following five criteria: (a) provided definitions for HCC diagnosis, (b) described HCC screening at baseline, (c) described HCC surveillance during therapy, (d) provided HCC data separately in patients with and without cirrhosis, and (e) provided HCC data in relation to virological response. According to these criteria, 14 studies were characterized to be of high [19][20][21][22][24][25][26][27]29,32,[35][36][37][38] and 7 to be of low quality [18,23,28,30,31,33,34]. Ten studies were considered as large [18,20,22,26,29,32,33,[36][37][38] and 11 as small [19,21,[23][24][25]27,28,30,31,34,35] if the total number of patients was more than 100 or less than 100, respectively.…”