2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-021-01432-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LAMP-HQ: A Large-Scale Multi-pose High-Quality Database and Benchmark for NIR-VIS Face Recognition

Abstract: Near-infrared-visible (NIR-VIS) heterogeneous face recognition matches NIR to corresponding VIS face images. However, due to the sensing gap, NIR images often lose some identity information so that the NIR-VIS recognition issue is more difficult than conventional VIS face recognition. Recently, NIR-VIS heterogeneous face recognition has attracted considerable attention in the computer vision community because of its convenience and adaptability in practical applications. Various deep learning-based methods hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition systems presented in the literature that are based on Gabor wavelet Transform and Support Machine Vector (SVM) achieve a recognition rate of 96.4% [12]. The recognition systems based on Convolutional Neural Network [14], [15], [16], [18], [22] achieve respectively accuracy in [98.6% -99.6%], [94.94% -97.91%] and [98.15%, 95.2%,95.5%], [99.89%, 99.56%],[98.5%-98.8%, 98.5%-99.3%] depending on database. Also [23] used hyperspectrals camera with neural networks and get [99.76%, 100%, 99.6%] accuracies on three different databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recognition systems presented in the literature that are based on Gabor wavelet Transform and Support Machine Vector (SVM) achieve a recognition rate of 96.4% [12]. The recognition systems based on Convolutional Neural Network [14], [15], [16], [18], [22] achieve respectively accuracy in [98.6% -99.6%], [94.94% -97.91%] and [98.15%, 95.2%,95.5%], [99.89%, 99.56%],[98.5%-98.8%, 98.5%-99.3%] depending on database. Also [23] used hyperspectrals camera with neural networks and get [99.76%, 100%, 99.6%] accuracies on three different databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Yu et al [15] have implemented face recognition system that used Generative Adversarial Networks(GANs) in the VIS and NIR. The VIS images have been generated from the NIR images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing DCNNbased visible face recognition methods will not perform well when directly applied to the problem of thermal to visible face recognition due to the significant distributional shift between the thermal and visible domains. In order to bridge this gap, various cross-domain face recognition algorithms have been proposed [7], [14], [13], [43], [44], [47], [29], [27], [5], [37], [36]. In particular, synthesis-based methods have gained a lot of traction in recent years [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al [40] proposed the FFWM model to overcome the illumination issue via flow-based feature warping. Thermal-to-visible Synthesis: Various approaches have been proposed in the literature for thermal-to-visible face synthesis and matching [7], [14], [13], [43], [44], [47], [29], [27], [5], [37], [36], [6], [34], [18]. For instance, Hu et al [14] developed a model based on partial least squares for heterogeneous face recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Large variation on facial attributes. Face images have various facial attributes including pose, complexion, expression, and illumination, which further increase intra-class distance and make it difficult for face matching [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%