2015
DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g55.12bar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lancashire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barras (2015, p. 277) explains that rhotic accents in England can be viewed as ‘unsophisticated’, reflective of ‘Farmer Giles’ imagery. This subsequently leads to potential stereotyping, as indicated by T29 himself, of being friendly, but unintelligent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barras (2015, p. 277) explains that rhotic accents in England can be viewed as ‘unsophisticated’, reflective of ‘Farmer Giles’ imagery. This subsequently leads to potential stereotyping, as indicated by T29 himself, of being friendly, but unintelligent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is framed within the synchronic research of the Lancashire dialect during the nineteenth century. Despite previous studies on this dialect (Ruano-García 2007; Barras 2015), the phonological features of this variety still remain unexplained. This is because research has mainly tackled the general linguistic phenomena of northern dialects or general dialect features of the Lancashire dialect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the importance of literary-dialect works in dialect research and the previous studies that have been carried out on the Lancashire dialect (Downing 1980;Sánchez 2003;Ruano-García 2007;Barras 2015), the phonological aspects of this variety remain largely unexplored. Thereby, the present paper expects to contribute to a better understanding of the phonological phenomena of the Lancashire vernacular.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is sometimes called the fur-bear merger or the her-hair merger and is typically associated with accents in Merseyside (Knowles, 1973;Wells, 1982:361;West, 2015;Watson & Clark, 2013) and in various locations in Greater Manchester and Lancashire such as Bolton and Blackburn (Turton, 2015). Although we cannot consider the phonetic quality of the merged vowel with our survey methods, it is commonly noted that present-day Liverpool speakers merge to a fronter-like [εː] pronunciation, whereas Lancashire has a more NURSE-like [ɜː] or [ɵː] vowel (Barras, 2006(Barras, , 2015Knowles, 1978:84;Shorrocks, 1999:205;West, 2015). It is likely that this difference is connected to rhoticity: the Lancashire areas have rhoticity or residual rhoticity, which may have a centralizing effect on the choice of vowel.…”
Section: Nurse-square Mergermentioning
confidence: 99%