2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land cover and air pollution are associated with asthma hospitalisations: A cross-sectional study

Abstract: We found differential effects of natural environments at high and low background pollutant concentrations. These findings can provide evidence for urban planning decisions which aim to leverage health co-benefits from environmental improvements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…beneficial effects of 10% increments in green cover within a 1 km residential buffer on COPD and asthma prevalence (OR 0·97, 95% CI 0·96-0·98); however, unlike the present study, prevalence data were derived from routine primary care electronic records and participants' residences were geocoded at the postcode level with green cover expressed as the percentage within 1 km of the postcode centroid in which a participant resided. 29 A UK study reported that green space and gardens were associated with reduced rates of asthma-related hospitalisations, 31 while a Spanish study of children reported beneficial effects on wheezing and bronchitis. 28 Our non-linear restricted cubic spline models, however, indicated that the beneficial effects of greenness on COPD levelled off after a threshold NDVI of 0·21 ( figure 2A), while a slight negative effect on lung function was observed beyond this threshold, with a 1·15% net reduction in lung function ( figure 2B).…”
Section: : Logistic Regression Models Of Association Between Copd Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…beneficial effects of 10% increments in green cover within a 1 km residential buffer on COPD and asthma prevalence (OR 0·97, 95% CI 0·96-0·98); however, unlike the present study, prevalence data were derived from routine primary care electronic records and participants' residences were geocoded at the postcode level with green cover expressed as the percentage within 1 km of the postcode centroid in which a participant resided. 29 A UK study reported that green space and gardens were associated with reduced rates of asthma-related hospitalisations, 31 while a Spanish study of children reported beneficial effects on wheezing and bronchitis. 28 Our non-linear restricted cubic spline models, however, indicated that the beneficial effects of greenness on COPD levelled off after a threshold NDVI of 0·21 ( figure 2A), while a slight negative effect on lung function was observed beyond this threshold, with a 1·15% net reduction in lung function ( figure 2B).…”
Section: : Logistic Regression Models Of Association Between Copd Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Few studies indicate protective effects of residential greenness on respiratory health, 28 and COPD 29 in particular. Evidence for asthma, allergic rhinitis, and aeroallergen sensitisation (thus far mostly among children) has been inconsistent 30 with some studies reporting protective effects, 31 as well as null, 32 or non-beneficial associations. 33,34 The evidence associating environmental exposures with COPD thus far has been inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of planning in the design of urban spaces with low species biodiversity at planting, overabundance of species acting as pollen sources, exotic species prompting new allergies in the population, botanical sexism, the presence of invasive species, inappropriate garden management and maintenance activities, cross‐reactivity between phylogenetically related species and the interaction between pollen, its microbiome, and air pollutants are major causes triggering pollen allergy . In recent decades, city planning strategies have favored pollen‐producing male bushes, trees, and plants.…”
Section: Framing the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even at a very basic level, the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and the sources of energy we rely on all depend on natural processes that support and regulate the environmental systems that support all life on the planet [2,91,92]. Given the extensive literature available on the direct and indirect benefits of natural ecosystems for human health and well-being (e.g., food, water, fuel etc.…”
Section: Benefits Of Natural Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%