2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.648378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land-cover classification of partly missing data using support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to train a model that accounts for values in the dataset that are not observed, one has to rely on assumptions that describe how missing data occurs. In this section, we describe the three main missing data mechanisms that characterize the structure of r [17].…”
Section: Missing Data Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to train a model that accounts for values in the dataset that are not observed, one has to rely on assumptions that describe how missing data occurs. In this section, we describe the three main missing data mechanisms that characterize the structure of r [17].…”
Section: Missing Data Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, we cluster pixels in high resolution land cover images contaminated with clouds, also used for classification in [16,17]. The data consists of three Landsat ETM+ images covering Hardangervidda in southern Norway, in addition to elevation and slope information.…”
Section: Land Cover Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, imputation may often produce suboptimal results, since the assumption of missingness at random [22] may not hold when missingness appears due to the properties of the sensors. Other works that utilize the missingness directly as part of the machine learning approach include Salberg and Jenssen [26], who propose to train SVMs for all types of missingness patterns for landcover classification, and Aksoy et al [23], who present a decision tree based model to data fusion when some modalities are partly missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing active learning methods, it is desirable that a recognition model has high accuracy while being capable of ranking unseen samples so that those with high ranks can be selected for manual labelling. Among various recognition methods, support vector machines (SVMs) have shown superior performance and have been widely used for VHR images analysis [31], [32], [33], [34]. Nevertheless, common SVMs can not provide accurate ranking information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%