2018
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1490976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land-cover mapping using Random Forest classification and incorporating NDVI time-series and texture: a case study of central Shandong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall accuracy was utilized to assess the accuracy of land use mapping using CART model. The overall accuracy is the proportion of total correctly classified pixels compared to the total number of pixels in the map [62,63]. The overall accuracy was calculated based on an error matrix generated by comparing reference data with classification results [64].…”
Section: Mapping Land Use Using the Cart Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy was utilized to assess the accuracy of land use mapping using CART model. The overall accuracy is the proportion of total correctly classified pixels compared to the total number of pixels in the map [62,63]. The overall accuracy was calculated based on an error matrix generated by comparing reference data with classification results [64].…”
Section: Mapping Land Use Using the Cart Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The built-up class attained higher PA values than UA values, which means that the XGB method correctly identified more ground truth pixels as bare soil, but the commission error was higher than the omission error. Including the Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture variables increases classification results (Jin et al, 2018), especially for various built-up classes (Zakeri et al, 2017). Low vegetation class was mostly misclassified to the forest class, and viceversa.…”
Section: Land-cover Classification On a Single-date S1 And S2 Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forest is one of the popular ensemble decision tree classifiers in remote sensing. Many researchers have demonstrated that the performance of RF is better than traditional single tree learning [72][73][74]. The advantages of RF include being less sensitive to overtraining and noises, the ability to generate variable importance for eliminating less important features in order to reduce dimension and computing time, as well as being unresponsive to overtraining [72,75].…”
Section: Pixel-based Techniques For Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have demonstrated that the performance of RF is better than traditional single tree learning [72][73][74]. The advantages of RF include being less sensitive to overtraining and noises, the ability to generate variable importance for eliminating less important features in order to reduce dimension and computing time, as well as being unresponsive to overtraining [72,75]. Nonetheless, RF tended to be insensitive to mislabeled training [76], delicate to spatial autocorrelation [77,78], and failed to deal with imbalance training [78].…”
Section: Pixel-based Techniques For Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%