Land Degradation–Desertification in Relation to Farming Practices in India: An Overview of Current Practices and Agro-Policy Perspectives

Abstract

Land degradation and desertification (LDD) has gained worldwide policy attention due to decline in land quality and the resultant economic burden accrued upon a vast population reliant on land-based natural capital. In India, the impacts are becoming apparent as 24 out of 29 states have been experiencing LDD since the early 2000s. Here, we adopt a mixed-method approach combining hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and multilinear regression analysis (MLRA) with contextual assessments to draw on, using state-level information from 2011–2013, an age-old question: do farming operations aggravate LDD? The HCA identified 11 states that currently lead the trajectory with the highest state-wise percentages of LDD areas under ‘water erosion’, ‘salinity’, and ‘water logging’, which are the three most widely reported impacts of farming practices on land systems’ sustainability as apparent in the relevant LDD literature. MLRA of the 11-state cluster revealed that state-wise NPK fertilizer-application rates (p < 0.01); number of moldboard ploughs (p < 0.01); net irrigated area (p < 0.01); groundwater-sourced irrigation (p < 0.05); and multiple cropping practices (p < 0.01) exacerbate LDD, while bio-pesticides (p < 0.05) and zero-till drills (p < 0.01) do the opposite. In recent years, the government has introduced several improved measures, such as nutrient-based subsidies (NBS) and integrated nutrient management (INM), to help farmers optimize agrochemical applications, thus moving from traditional practices (input intensive) to a more land-conservation-centric approach. However, at the cognitive level, farmers are unsure/unaware of the benefits. Moreover, due to various institutional weaknesses, lack of sensitization, extension services, capacity building, incentives, and certain inherent flaws in these newer strategies, their uptake remains low, while traditional practices continue at the grassroots. We attempt to broaden the regulatory purview by reflecting on the DPSIR framework (Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response), highlighting the role of indirect drivers of LDD that largely influence farmers’ preferences for certain practices. In the final section, we emphasize the need for a data revolution to support process-level research to be able to devise more informed and targeted LDD control–abatement strategies, which is currently largely absent.

A Lost Frontier or a New Gateway to Global Climate Action? The Afghan Leadership and the Revival of Afghanistan’s Mineral Sector

“…To that end, we believe that much of the success hinges upon how well the new leadership melds different spheres of development: (a) social and economic, (b) technological innovation and (c) environmental systems' governance (Figure 5). The idea is to imagine an inclusive system's governance, founded on an ecosystem of stakeholders, within a sphere of participatory action (Chaudhuri et al, 2020(Chaudhuri et al, , 2023(Chaudhuri et al, , 2024(Chaudhuri et al, , 2021b. Potential stakeholders may include (but are not limited to), the public agencies, development organisations, financial institutions, think tanks, research groups, NGOs, intergovernmental organisations, universities/technical education centres/research organisations, UN offices and any other that could potentially help develop sound mining/mineral exploration protocols.…”

Forests at the Crossroads: Biodiversity Conservation in the Era of Climate Change

“…These changes include shifts in rainfall up to 6mm and alterations in the duration and onset of the rainy season. Consequently, water scarcity is Forests at the Crossroads: Biodiversity Conservation in the Era of Climate Change DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004224 expected to amplify, intensifying the risk of land degradation [58,60,61]. Such climatic shifts pose a profound risk to the biodiversity of Sudan's drylands, diminishing ecosystem productivity and leading to losses in species diversity, ecosystem functions, and vegetation variety [58,62].…”

Vegetation–Lake–Sand Landscape of Northeast China Sandy Land between 1980 and 2022: Pattern, Evolution, and Driving Forces

“…Water evaporation and lake area decrease, vegetation habitat is reduced, plant growth is inhibited, and the vegetation coverage area is reduced. Vegetated areas are sensitive to precipitation [64], and the change in the vegetation landscape follows the change trend of precipitation. In a study on the response of vegetation coverage to precipitation changes in typical sandy land in eastern China, Kaymaz et al [65] confirmed this point [66].…”