Land-Development Offset Policies in the Quest for Sustainability: What Can China Learn from Germany?

Abstract

Land-development offset policies consist of measures that require compensation to be made for the negative impact of land development on agricultural production, ecological and environmental conservation, and the sustainability of economic and social development. However, when such policies are inappropriately designed, unexpected problems can result. This paper describes certain land-development offset policies that have recently been implemented in China, with a particular emphasis on three such policies: the Balancing Policy, the Linkage Policy, and the Integrated Policy. These well-intentioned environmental policies have led to unexpected ecological, social, and cultural problems. This paper also describes the core of German land-development policy, which features a distinctive compensation system that has been employed since the 1970s, and compares Chinese and German land-development policies to highlight differences in three main areas: policy purposes, governance structures, and fundamental institutions. The comparisons might help explain the unexpected outcomes in China, and they also lead to land-development offset policy recommendations for China in the near future.

Urban Land Expansion and Structural Change in the Yangtze River Delta, China

“…Between 1978 and 2013, the nation's urbanization rate has increased from 17.9% to 53.7%. The rapid pace of urbanization has resulted in not only dramatic urban land expansion, but also issues such as environmental resources depletion, food deficits, and land degradation [1][2][3]. The socioeconomic and environmental problems, characterized by rapid urban land expansion, have become major challenges for achieving sustainable urban development (SUD) in China.…”

Rural Renewal of China in the Context of Rural-Urban Integration: Governance Fit and Performance Differences

“…Therefore, the rural-urban land use structure in this area urgently needed to be optimized. The policy of Linkage between Urban Land Taking and Rural Land Giving (LUTRG) provided an opportunity for such optimization and it consists of a spectrum of land use changes led by the government [40,41]. Rural construction land is re-planned, consolidated and readjusted.…”

Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Urban Systems in China during Rapid Urbanization

“…The attractiveness of megacities lies in higher wages, more job opportunities and more public goods (such as hospitals, schools and entertainments) for a better life [63]. However, megacities' expansion in China has sharply increased residents' commuting cost and local government's infrastructure investment in suburban areas, which saps city productivity, as well as residents' quality of life [37,63]. Especially in recent years, the sharp increase of commuting distance has caused the problem of city function disorder.…”

“…City system evolution is driven by two types of opposed forces: market force and government intervention [33,37]. Efficiency and equity are dual goals for building healthy and coordinated urban hierarchy, and balancing market and government is a common principle for policy making [14].…”