Land Grabbing in Europe? Socio-Cultural Externalities of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in East Germany

Abstract

Recently, we witnessed an immense increase in international land transactions in the Global South, a phenomenon slowly expanding in northern industrialized countries, too. Even though in Europe agriculture plays a decreasing economic role for rural livelihoods, the increases in land transactions by non-local, non-agricultural investors pervades rural life. Nevertheless, the underlying processes are not yet well understood. Large-scale land acquisitions describe such purchases and leases in a neutral way, while ‘land grabbing’ expresses negative consequences for rural people. We investigate whether and under which conditions the term land grabbing is justified for the phenomenon observed in Europe. We propose six socio-cultural criteria that scholars should consider to come to an initial classification: legal irregularities, non-residence of new owners, centralization in decision-making structures, treating land as an investment object, concentration of decision-power, and limited access to land markets. We supplement our findings with empirical material from East Germany, where such land acquisition processes occur. Our paper contributes to the ongoing discussion about agricultural structural change in Europe, which is intensified by increasing land prices and a new distribution of landownership but likewise strongly intertwined with rural development.

State Interventionism in Agricultural Land Turnover in Poland

“…It is also difficult to identify the phenomenon observed in Europe with those occurring in Asia or Africa. There are, however, various scholars who use "land grabbing" as a synonym for investments taking place without thoroughly reflecting on what it means, for example in the European context [40][41][42][43].…”

Land Concentration, Land Grabbing and Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Romania

“…Of course, the situation of the land areas owned by agricultural holdings in Germany bears the imprint of the reunification of East Germany with West Germany. The existence of smaller fields in the West and larger areas located to the East of Elbe River characterize the farming landscape [6]. The land retrocession after 1989 to the former owners who possessed less than 100 ha during the German Democratic Republic times and had been expropriated between 1945 and 1949, were made by purchase, at a reduced price, from the Land Administration and Privatization Agency (BVVG Bodenverwertungs-und -Verwaltung GmbH).…”

“…Land is not a mere commodity that is traded on the market at a particular value. The transfer of property rights among people makes land ownership is a social relationship, and the connection between people and land amplifies a feeling of national and local identity [6]. Rural landscapes and celebrations related to land cultivation have created emotional connections to rural areas by their inhabitants.…”

Expansion of Oil Palm Plantations in Indonesia’s Frontier: Problems of Externalities and the Future of Local and Indigenous Communities

“…In this paper, an externality is viewed as a social cost [9][10][11], and not simply as an unexpected impact. The ongoing expansion of land-based investments in the frontier areas tends to lead to significant externalities.…”