Land of Plenty, Land of Misery: Synergetic Resource Grabbing in Mozambique

Abstract

Global climate change policy enforcement has become the new driving force of resource grabbing in the context of the “scramble of resources” in Africa. Nevertheless, the environmental crisis should not be seen as an isolated phenomenon amid contemporary capitalism. On the contrary, a very distinct feature of the current wave of land grabs is the convergence of multiple crises, including food, energy/fuel, environmental, and financial. The Southern Mozambique District, Massingir, is an area with high potential regarding water sources and biodiversity. It recently became a host of a biofuel project, and also a huge block of land is being transformed into a conservation/tourism area; answering to many issues within capitalism’s crisis, this area is an evidence of how synergetic resource grabbing can arise as a response to the convergence of multiple crises. Therefore, by analyzing the emerging politics of natural resources in Massingir District and the dynamics regarding the land-use change, changes in property relations, it is possible to understand how rural livelihoods are shaped. Risks related to food security and sovereignty, loss of control and access to resources, consistent narrowing down of the set of livelihood strategies, and inter-community conflicts over scarce resources are the main implications of such emerging climate-smart land politics.

Outlook for the biomass energy sector in Mozambique: Policies and their challenges

“…However, there seems to be inconsistency between formal and informal land rights and it is not clear whether being a member of the community is about descent or is based on residence; that is, it is not clear whether immigrants are also legitimate members of the community and therefore have the right to use and benefit from the land. This can hinder the legitimation of users of natural resources within the community, which can increase the number of cases of conflicts, as reported in several studies (Bleyer et al, 2016;Bruna, 2019;Baumert et al, 2019;Filipe and Norfolk, 2017;Kosenius et al, 2019), and can increase the number of explorers, increasingly undermining the sustainable use of resources.…”

Land grabbing, financeirização da agricultura e mercado de terras: velhas e novas dimensões da questão agrária no Brasil

“…Como é sabido, as dinâmicas de apropriação de terras e de recursos não são novidade na história brasileira, datando de nossa colonização. Olhando para o caso brasileiro, podemos sugerir que os processos de alienação e apropriação das terras ocorrem em ondas (Bruna, 2019), que conformam diferentes dinâmicas de despossessão promovidas ou intermediadas, de forma diferenciada, pelo Estado (Levien, 2014). A primeira onda, ainda no século XVI, foi marcada pela acentuada extração de recursos ditada pela dinâmica Metrópole/Colônia e pelo regime escravagista.…”

Using anticipation to unveil drivers of local livelihoods in Transfrontier Conservation Areas: A call for more environmental justice

“…Benefits rarely reach local communities, who have to bear most of the conservation costs (Mbaiwa, 2005; Norton‐Griffiths & Said, 2010). This situation paves the way to hegemonic practices, exclusion, manipulation and limited benefits to local citizens (Bruna, 2019; Fairhead et al, 2012; Lunstrum, 2016; Witter, 2013). Often the operation of protected areas has come in direct conflict with the basic needs of human development (Anderies et al, 2007; Cumming et al, 2014).…”