2010
DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2010.491298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land price premiums in South Africa's land redistribution process: A case study of Northern Kwazulu-Natal sugarcane farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this time, 'almost 32% of all rural households (were) estimated as having holdings of less than 1.0 ha of land'. These are huge ownership inequalities but still better than those reported for South Africa in 1994, where white people owned 87% of land resources, with only 13% owned by black people (Mbatha et al 2010). …”
Section: An Overview Of the Reform Process In Kenyamentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At this time, 'almost 32% of all rural households (were) estimated as having holdings of less than 1.0 ha of land'. These are huge ownership inequalities but still better than those reported for South Africa in 1994, where white people owned 87% of land resources, with only 13% owned by black people (Mbatha et al 2010). …”
Section: An Overview Of the Reform Process In Kenyamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A historical presentation of an evolving land reform policy landscape is presented alongside a review of ethnographic cases in two regions (Limpopo and KwaZuluNatal). The local resettlement data come from cases of sugarcane farmlands of KwaZulu-Natal (Mbatha & Antrobus 2012;Mbatha et al 2010), as well as community settlement cases presented by Terblanche, Stevens and Sekgota (2014). Throughout the discussion, a reflection on what threads run across the international and local cases is compared for general and specific themes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From inception it has been accepted that the programmes were premised on the foundations of a pricing system derived from a competitive market mechanism to achieve a market-related kind of fairness. The mechanism is often referred to as the 'willing buyer-willing seller' framework (see Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE), 2008, and Mbatha et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%