2020
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3729-9.ch007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land, Rights, and Tenure Insecurity on Customary Land in Zambia

Abstract: Land is a key asset in the lives of village communities in Zambia. It is thus at the centre of their livelihood strategies as it provides social, economic, and financial benefits to these communities. The paradox though is that despite acknowledging its importance in the lives of village communities, tenure on this land is poorly protected by the state resulting in high insecurity for its occupants. In many instances, there are no clear regulations on its use and alienation while traditional authorities are al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article favoured comparisons across continents (Jovanović-Milenković et al ., 2020) and countries, adding Italy to studies on China (Zhang and Wang, 2010; Huang et al ., 2022), Poland (Kowalski et al ., 2023; Marona and Tomal, 2020), Indonesia (Oey and Lim, 2020), Zambia (Munshifwa et al ., 2021), India (Karthiyaini et al ., 2020), Thailand (Khuntaweetep and Koowattanatianchai, 2022), etc. It was more difficult to compare with other studies related to Italy, although valuable (Avallone and Quagli, 2015; Mattarocci and Scimone, 2021; Gabrielli et al ., 2022) because the methodology used was different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article favoured comparisons across continents (Jovanović-Milenković et al ., 2020) and countries, adding Italy to studies on China (Zhang and Wang, 2010; Huang et al ., 2022), Poland (Kowalski et al ., 2023; Marona and Tomal, 2020), Indonesia (Oey and Lim, 2020), Zambia (Munshifwa et al ., 2021), India (Karthiyaini et al ., 2020), Thailand (Khuntaweetep and Koowattanatianchai, 2022), etc. It was more difficult to compare with other studies related to Italy, although valuable (Avallone and Quagli, 2015; Mattarocci and Scimone, 2021; Gabrielli et al ., 2022) because the methodology used was different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, however, it seems that the processes of migration of values to and from the sector do not show any relevant changes when comparing the periods before and after the pandemic, at least in Poland (Kowalski et al ., 2023). A more comprehensive analysis, however, must also consider the choices of tenants and not only those of investors, which are more widely studied (Munshifwa et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point at the latest, access to land would become almost impossible for the majority of the rural population, and even more so for rural women, who were often in a financially dependent position. Reluctance to give away customary land for titling was thus common, as were fears that some people would benefit disproportionately [26,33], like what happened when land was titled and then pooled for the Magobbo Trust [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also noted that the introduction of the leasehold title alone did not increase women's land ownership as intended. Consequently, in 2000, a gender policy and subsequent draft land policies stipulated land ownership by women; however, success was still only moderate [31][32][33]. There are unresolved questions about who approves the allocation of private land that is collectively used, and who receives the land title if the extended kinship has a customary right to use the land.…”
Section: Land Tenure Systems In Zambiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main underlying cause of social conflicts in Zambia, as observed in Kaindu, was the land control and allocation process, which, according to Munshifwa (2018), is marred by inertia, confusion, and corruption. The state purposefully generated a situation of inertness by instituting an extremely slow land tenure reform process during the 1990s, which has also led to inconclusive land policy formulation processes whose drafts are constantly rejected by -of-en the president and the traditional leaders over who should oversee land alienation.…”
Section: Interactions Of the Political Economic And Civil Society Act...mentioning
confidence: 99%