1997
DOI: 10.1029/97gl00817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land subsidence caused by the East Mesa Geothermal Field, California, observed using SAR interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, previous geodetic analyses of geothermal regions have already been performed and have shown that vertical and horizontal displacements have been caused by geothermal exploitation (e.g. Massonnet et al 1997;Carnec and Fabriol 1999;Fialko and Simons 2000;Nishijima et al 2005;Glowacka et al 2010;Jeanne et al 2014). Note that surface displacement can also be observed during the drilling phase (Lubitz et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, previous geodetic analyses of geothermal regions have already been performed and have shown that vertical and horizontal displacements have been caused by geothermal exploitation (e.g. Massonnet et al 1997;Carnec and Fabriol 1999;Fialko and Simons 2000;Nishijima et al 2005;Glowacka et al 2010;Jeanne et al 2014). Note that surface displacement can also be observed during the drilling phase (Lubitz et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…InSAR techniques have been applied to study surface deformation related to the earthquake cycle (Massonnet et al 1993;Zebker et al 1994;Fialko et al 2005;Burgmann et al 2006;Peltzer et al 2001), magmatic activity (Amelung et al 2000;Pritchard and Simons 2002;Hooper et al 2004;Wright et al 2006;Wicks et al 2006;Doubre and Peltzer 2007;Biggs et al 2009) and subsurface reservoirs (Jonsson et al 1998;Massonnet et al 1997;Amelung et al 1999;Fialko and Simons 2000;Bawden et al 2001;Newman et al 2006;Gourmelen et al 2007;Vasco et al 2008).…”
Section: Insar and Ps-insarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its high sensitivity to vertical displacement, the InSAR monitoring of the human-induced subsidence phenomenon became one of the main applications (e.g., Massonnet et al, 1997;Fielding et al, 1998;Galloway et al, 1998;Lazecky et al, 2010), especially in urban areas where the number of coherent pixels over time remains high (e.g., Hoffmann et al, 2001;Watson et al, 2002;Stramondo et al, 2008;López-Quiroz et al, 2009;Crosetto et al, 2010;Crosetto et al, 2013). The decorrelation noise results either from a variation of the satellite LOS direction for the two images (different look and squint angles) or from a change of the scatterer position or geometry within the resolution cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atmospheric delay error, however, poses one of the major challenges to InSAR geodesy, especially for monitoring deformation signals with small magnitude and long wavelength. These deformation signals could be due to regional surface subsidence [1], landslides [2], volcanic eruptions [3], tidal loading [4], tectonic slow slip [5], and earthquakes [6]. Atmospheric delays are typically introduced by the ionosphere and the troposphere when radio signals propagate through the atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%