2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-02138-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land subsidence prediction using recurrent neural networks

Abstract: In an environment, one of the natural geological hazards is land surface subsidence. There are several reasons for land subsidence among them are underground coal mining and coal fire in subsurface. The deformation is primarily measured in terms of change in ground elevation values (Z-dimension) at different time intervals at identified ground locations. All the conventional and exiting techniques have certain limitations in monitoring and predicting land surface subsidence. In this work, we predict the land s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of Bi‐LSTM is under the influence of two hyperparameters, which are (a) Window length and (b) Batch size [46]. We conducted experiments on these hyperparameters and plot the results in Figure 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of Bi‐LSTM is under the influence of two hyperparameters, which are (a) Window length and (b) Batch size [46]. We conducted experiments on these hyperparameters and plot the results in Figure 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each LSTM network utilises an input gate, an output gate and a forget gate to control memory cells. Figure 7 shows the structure of the LSTM cell [46]. For time t , the input gate is represented by i t , the forget gate by f t and the output gate by o t .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is well known that LSTM [ 29 ] has an excellent ability to explore temporal dynamic features. However, most methods often use temporal dynamic features directly to predict the action.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%