2006
DOI: 10.1175/bams-87-11-1573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Surface Microwave Emissivities over the Globe for a Decade

Abstract: Microwave land surface emissivities have been calculated over the globe for ~10 yr between 19 and 85 GHz at 53° incidence angle for both orthogonal polarizations, using satellite observations from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I). Ancillary data (IR satellite observations and meteorological reanalysis) help remove the contribution from the atmosphere, clouds, and rain from the measured satellite signal and separate surface temperature from emissivity variations. The method to calculate the emissivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Set, 1993Set, -2004 [37] Passive microwave emissivities between 19 and 85 GHz estimated from the SSM/I observations are the core data set used in our methodology to estimate global surface water extent. First available from 1993 to 2000, the emissivity time series have been extended to 2004 following the methodology described by Prigent et al [1997Prigent et al [ , 2006. However, intensive analyses of the emissivity times series recently revealed an issue after September 2001, as illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Different Data Options Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Set, 1993Set, -2004 [37] Passive microwave emissivities between 19 and 85 GHz estimated from the SSM/I observations are the core data set used in our methodology to estimate global surface water extent. First available from 1993 to 2000, the emissivity time series have been extended to 2004 following the methodology described by Prigent et al [1997Prigent et al [ , 2006. However, intensive analyses of the emissivity times series recently revealed an issue after September 2001, as illustrated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Different Data Options Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] The cause of this discrepancy in the emissivity data sets has its main source in the abrupt change from September 2001 observed in the ISCCP surface skin temperature derived from IR observations [Rossow and Schiffer, 1999] that are used in the emissivity calculation methodology [see equations 1 and 2 and Figure 1 in Prigent et al, 2006]. This is illustrated in Figure 4b, which shows the change in the monthly mean surface skin temperature from ISCCP after September 2001 at the global scale, for the Nile and the Amazon rivers.…”
Section: Global Emissivity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Passive microwave emissivities between 19 and 85 GHz, estimated from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) observations by removing the contributions of the atmosphere (water vapor, clouds, rain) and the modulation by the surface temperature [38], as well as incorporating ancillary data from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) [39] and the National Centers for Environment Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis [40]. (3) Backscatter at 5.25 GHz from the European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellite scatterometer.…”
Section: Giemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Backscatter at 5.25 GHz from the European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellite scatterometer. ERS observations are averaged over each month and mapped to an equal area grid of 0.25° resolution at the equator (each pixel equals 773 km2) [23,38].…”
Section: Giemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface emissivity is either prescribed using the 10-yr emissivity atlas of Prigent et al (2006) for the continental cases or computed within RTTOV with the Fast Emissivity Model-3 (FASTEM-3; Deblonde and English 2000) and 10-m wind speed. The 1990-2007 archive of ARSA is considered and only profiles restricted to the 308N/308S belt are kept.…”
Section: ) the Synthetic Training Setmentioning
confidence: 99%