2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use and land cover changes and Soil erosion in Yezat Watershed, North Western Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the local communities within the study area have well recognized the possible environmental threats posed by the water-induced soil erosion and because of this, putting efforts into SWC practices in erosion-prone areas. Supporting the current study's findings, Tadesse et al [139] noted considerable improvement in the soil erosion and rehabilitation of degraded lands in the Yezat Watershed of North Western Ethiopia following implementation of integrated watershed development programs. Validating these findings, Akale et al [140] also reported that implementation of upland conservation measures significantly reduced the surface runoff and increased base flow in the Guale and Tikur-Wuha watersheds of the Ethiopian highlands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This implies that the local communities within the study area have well recognized the possible environmental threats posed by the water-induced soil erosion and because of this, putting efforts into SWC practices in erosion-prone areas. Supporting the current study's findings, Tadesse et al [139] noted considerable improvement in the soil erosion and rehabilitation of degraded lands in the Yezat Watershed of North Western Ethiopia following implementation of integrated watershed development programs. Validating these findings, Akale et al [140] also reported that implementation of upland conservation measures significantly reduced the surface runoff and increased base flow in the Guale and Tikur-Wuha watersheds of the Ethiopian highlands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This result could be explained by the fact that, even though the roles of the respondents were different along the Soyang watershed, they were especially concerned about the water quality level in the Soyang watershed. This was in line with the result, which showed the importance of the socio-economic determinants in the heterogeneous choice of the respondents [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: A Conditional Logit Model With Two-way Interactionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With the emphasis on soil conservation measures, some studies focused on quantifying the costs and benefits for sustainable land use management practices [42,43]. Previous studies addressed land use and land cover changes in the spatial and temporal changes in the watershed as well as sustainable land use management [44].…”
Section: A Conditional Logit Model With Three-way Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to expansion of agricultural and urban areas which are devoid of trees that can negatively control biosphere carbon fixation. As reported by Lemlem et al (2017), agricultural expansion has reduced woody biomass production. More importantly, most farm plots were devoid of broad leaf woods which intern reduces NPP at areas with intensive agriculture (Binyam et al 2015).…”
Section: Vegetation Changes Across Slope Gradient and Agroecologymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Contrary to prospectus government reports, still there was natural vegetation degradation with opportunity cost of human induced land use pattern (Temesgen and Tesfahun 2014;Adugnaw et al 2016). In these respect, some studies have reported as ISWCP have brought significant changes in agricultural productivity (Chisholm and Tassew 2012;Schmidt and Fanaye 2012), reduction of soil erosion and sedimentation (Kebede 2014;Nigussie et al 2015;Molla 2016;Asnake 2017;Lemlem et al 2017), vegetation change and positive hydrological responses (Fikir et al 2009;Nyssen et al 2010;Shimeles 2012), climate change adaptation (Meaza 2015), biomass recovery (Essayas et al 2014;Lemlem et al 2017). Though these studies have reported prospectus impacts of integrated soil and water conservation programs, still there is no any study undertaken to show long-term watershed level vegetation productivity and vegetation regeneration to see impacts of conservation programs on ecosystem health and productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%