2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use and land cover changes in post-socialist countries: Some observations from Hungary and Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Once all the layers were projected, the polygon's surface was recalculated and three basic geometries were obtained: the CLC Dataset for 2006 (Romania), the CLC Dataset for 2018 (Romania) and the Romanian LAU2 geometry. Despite the fact that the use of the CLC data integrated in a LAU2 frame is quite spread, many precautions are necessary at this level of analysis, if one will take into account aspects like the Minimum Mapping Unit (MMU = 25 ha/100 m), the possible Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) effect in the local data integration of land use and local trends of economic specialization [29]. In some cases, when combined, these effects create interpretation artifacts: in 2018, 14 LAU2 from 3186 in Romania are completely missing the category CLC112 (discontinuous urban fabric).…”
Section: Datasets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once all the layers were projected, the polygon's surface was recalculated and three basic geometries were obtained: the CLC Dataset for 2006 (Romania), the CLC Dataset for 2018 (Romania) and the Romanian LAU2 geometry. Despite the fact that the use of the CLC data integrated in a LAU2 frame is quite spread, many precautions are necessary at this level of analysis, if one will take into account aspects like the Minimum Mapping Unit (MMU = 25 ha/100 m), the possible Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) effect in the local data integration of land use and local trends of economic specialization [29]. In some cases, when combined, these effects create interpretation artifacts: in 2018, 14 LAU2 from 3186 in Romania are completely missing the category CLC112 (discontinuous urban fabric).…”
Section: Datasets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper employs statistical methods to determine land use trends, the ArcGIS grid calculator was used to calculate the spatial variation characteristics of land use, and the spatial transfer matrix was calculated using the ArcGIS overlay analysis function [39,40].…”
Section: Calculation Of Land Use Cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owners of farms split their farms into smaller plots, mainly due to the process of transferring land to their heirs. The problem associated with excessive fragmentation of land refers to Mexico [4], India [5], Central Europe [6,7], China [8], Cyprus [9] Bulgaria [10], Turkey [11], Spain [12,13], Czech Republic [14], Hungary [15], Poland [16], The Netherlands [17], and Albania [18]. Another reason that land fragmentation occurred in Central and Eastern Europe after the fall of Communism in the 1990s was due to the process of contribution to building a full-featured real property cadastre [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%