1981
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use Controls: The Case of Zoning in the Vancouver Area

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between rezoning and changes in observed property values and the ability of zoning to mitigate externalities. Three separate methodologies are used in three locations in metropolitan Vancouver to examine these issues. Our results imply that rezoning does not necessarily lead to changes in land use and value. Further, no evidence was found to support the assertion that there are significant negative externalities due to incompatible land uses in residential property markets.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land use planning controls, which attenuate the development right of individual land owners, protect land users in the neighborhood against detrimental externalities caused by individual developments. State regulatory intervention in the private land market is well recognized as playing a constructive role in the shaping of a functional land market (Stull, 1975;Mark and Goldberg, 1981). By assigning rights and liabilities, the state plays a supportive role contributing to efficiency on the one hand.…”
Section: Property Rights and Place-making: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land use planning controls, which attenuate the development right of individual land owners, protect land users in the neighborhood against detrimental externalities caused by individual developments. State regulatory intervention in the private land market is well recognized as playing a constructive role in the shaping of a functional land market (Stull, 1975;Mark and Goldberg, 1981). By assigning rights and liabilities, the state plays a supportive role contributing to efficiency on the one hand.…”
Section: Property Rights and Place-making: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No evidence currently exists on this issue and the results of some studies suggest that market forces may be too immutable for CP to make much of a difference. 6 In particular, the findings of Wallace (1988), McMillan andMcDonald (1991, 1993), and Mark andGoldberg (1981, 1986) suggest that the patterns of land use and values that occur after a system of land use regulation and planning is imposed closely matches what would have been produced by a free market. This will happen, it is argued, because there is considerable political pressure from landowners to allow the ''highest and best use'' of land at each location in order to maximize aggregate land value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, by assigning rights and liabilities, the state may play a role that is conducive to efficiency (Lai, 1997). Rent dissipation may occur due to the attenuation of property rights by state intervention (Stull, 1975;Mark and Goldberg, 1981). Lai (1997: 196), however, argues that the 'meaningful question is whether the cost of such attenuation is greater or smaller than the alternative of leaving the matter entirely to the unregulated market'.…”
Section: Property Rights and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%