PsycEXTRA Dataset 1997
DOI: 10.1037/e453732008-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use transportation interaction: An examination of the 1995 NPTS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding density, it is suggested that low-density developments (i.e., ones promoting urban sprawl) do not encourage walking and other physical activities (Kelly-Schwartz et al, 2004;Saelens & Handy, 2008;Saelens, Sallis, & Frank, 2003). Ross and Dunning (1997) support this claim by purporting that walking and bicycling is the more frequent transport mode choice in higher versus lower density neighborhood blocks. Forsyth and colleagues (Forsyth, Hearst, Oakes, & Schmitz, 2008;Forsyth, Oakes, Schmitz, & Hearst, 2007; provided somewhat contradictory support for this conclusion by stating that whereas dense areas promote travel walking, less-connected neighborhood blocks promote leisure walking; total physical activity is not affected.…”
Section: Design For Health 139mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Regarding density, it is suggested that low-density developments (i.e., ones promoting urban sprawl) do not encourage walking and other physical activities (Kelly-Schwartz et al, 2004;Saelens & Handy, 2008;Saelens, Sallis, & Frank, 2003). Ross and Dunning (1997) support this claim by purporting that walking and bicycling is the more frequent transport mode choice in higher versus lower density neighborhood blocks. Forsyth and colleagues (Forsyth, Hearst, Oakes, & Schmitz, 2008;Forsyth, Oakes, Schmitz, & Hearst, 2007; provided somewhat contradictory support for this conclusion by stating that whereas dense areas promote travel walking, less-connected neighborhood blocks promote leisure walking; total physical activity is not affected.…”
Section: Design For Health 139mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Urban planners find extremely low rates of walking for transportation and few pedestrian-favourable land-use policies 46 . Walking/biking increases with proximity, density, connectivity 44,45,47 , higher population density 48,49 , land-use mix, pedestrian advances (e.g. sidewalk connectivity) 50 -52 and reduced pollution 53 .…”
Section: Box 1 -Causal Web Of Influence On the Prevalence Of Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of current research in physical activity, and transportation planning and public health, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] we postulated that level specific built environment factors specified in this study would independently account for variation in older adults' walking both at the neighbourhood level and at the resident level. Our specific hypothesis was that neighbourhoods with high level density of places of employment, high level household density, greater numbers of street intersections, and green and open spaces for recreation, would be positively associated with increased walking activity in neighbourhoods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%