Landfarming: A contested space for the management of waste from oil and gas extraction

Abstract

The extraction of unconventional hydrocarbons, particularly through hydraulic fracturing ('fracking'), has generated both support and opposition in many countries around the globe. Along with arguments about economic benefits, decarbonisation, transition fuels and groundwater contamination etc., the rapid expansion of this industry presents a pressing problem as regards the disposal of the resultant waste -including drilling and cutting material, oil and gas residues, various chemicals used in the process, salts and produced water. One putative solution -'landfarming' -is a disposal process that involves spreading oil and gas waste on to land and mixing it with topsoil to allow bioremediation of the hydrocarbons. This paper examines the case of landfarming in New Zealand where the practice has proved controversial due to its association with fracking, fears about the contamination of agricultural land and potential danger to milk supplies. Drawing upon Gieryn's notion of cultural cartography and boundary work as well as the literature on the politics of scale it analyses the struggles for epistemic authority regarding the safety of landfarming. The paper concludes that scalar practices were central to the production of knowledge (and ignorance) in these credibility struggles, and that the prevailing cultural cartography of knowledge remained the arbiter and basis for policy. The case has wider implications in terms of the management of waste from unconventional hydrocarbons as well as other environmental issues in which the politics of scale figure in contested knowledge claims.

Impact of the Tengiz Oil Field on the State of Land Cover

“…Nowadays, satellite monitoring is increasingly used along with the traditional ground-based methods of observing the state of landscapes (Bloomfield, Doolin 2017;Mjachina et al 2018). The advantages of remote monitoring of land cover based on satellite images are the scale of research and the possibility of obtaining a variety of operational or archival information about the state of natural components.…”

Making the subsurface political: How enhanced oil recovery techniques reshaped the energy transition

“…Taking the opposite view of ecological modernization, this article asserts that social mobilization remains central in defining the meaning of a technology. Drawing on the politics of scale (Bloomfield and Doolin, 2017;Huber and Emel, 2009), we investigate how scalar conflicts are key in explaining conflicting views about the role of the subsurface for energy transition and the dynamics between technical solutions and conflicting national/subnational frameworks.…”

Beyond the Hemp House: Exploring potential for the deployment of hempcrete in Aotearoa’s medium-density housing

“…Landfarming is an agricultural practice where drilling waste contaminated with hydrocarbons from fossil fuel exploration is spread through soil and sown with a pasture crop to remediate the soil (Kerckhoffs et al, 2015). Public health concerns over dairy farming on landfarmed soils in 2013 brought attention to the risks of producing food on landfarmed soils (Bloomfield & Doolin, 2017). In light of such health concerns, hemp cultivated on landfarmed land cannot be utilised for food products (Kerckhoffs et al, 2015), but the hurds could still be used for building materials.…”