Landfill Site Selection Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Remote Sensing Data, and Geographic Information System Tools in Najran City, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Many practical issues arise when dealing with solid waste management, and there are also environmental effects to be considered. Selecting landfill sites requires extra care with respect to many factors such as the environment, health hazards for people, and the cost of transportation. Furthermore, cities have their own rules, methods, and practices for managing and selecting the best locations for collecting solid waste. In this research, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was presented and used to evaluate the appropriateness of and suggest the best locations for landfill sites in Najran, KSA. Some remote sensing data and the ArcGIS software were used to prepare nine thematic layers, including drainage density, groundwater depth, land use, soil type, road network, surface elevation, surface slope, distance from residential areas, and distance from protected areas. To evaluate the layer weightings, a questionnaire with pairwise comparisons was distributed among experts and analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy set technique. The one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) sensitivity test was conducted to test the sensitivity of the evaluated weightings. A landfill suitability index (LSI) map was created using raster calculator tools and divided into five classes: limited suitability (LSI value 1.39–2.49), least suitable (2.50–3.03), relatively suitable (3.04–3.48), suitable (3.49–3.91), and most suitable (3.92–4.66). According to the statistical analysis, 18.0% and 18.2% of the total area were within the most suitable and suitable landfill regions, while 21.2%, 14.9%, and 9.5% accounted for relatively suitable, least suitable, and limited suitability areas, respectively. The employed technique and its findings can provide an appropriate guideline to assist the municipality of Najran city, regional planners, and decision-makers in selecting an optimal landfill site in the future. This study also presented some recommendations to enhance the suitability map of landfill sites in Najran city.

Exploring the Significance of Heritage Preservation in Enhancing the Settlement System Resilience

“…In our study, we opted to use the multidimensional analysis method, which considers a range of criteria influencing the resilience of rural settlements. Most recent research commonly employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology for conducting multicriteria assessments across multiple research areas [46][47][48]. The AHP method provides a systematic framework for decision-making by establishing a hierarchical structure that captures the various dimensions, criteria, and indicators relevant to the assessment [49][50][51][52].…”

A Framework for Waste Management Plan in Cities (Case Study Great Cairo Region)

“…Selecting a landfill location that is remote from sensitive land uses and residential areas is important. Furthermore, the landfill has to be planned and run to reduce these adverse effects [26].…”

Decision making approaches for recognizing the optimal alkalized corchorus olitorius powder based composites for sustainable applications

“…AHP allows decision-makers to assess the significance of various factors. By assigning weights to these factors, decision-makers can select the best alternatives based on their maximum weighted values [20]. In 1981, Hwang and Yoon proposed the TOPSIS technique for calculating MCDM issues using multiple options.…”

“…The AHP-TOPSIS technique is a hybridized MCDM process used to determine the most suitable material among numerous alternatives. This has proven to be a reliable MCDM process that produces good and precise outcomes for complex problems [20,23]. Hambali et al [13] used the AHP technique and found that glass-fiberreinforced composites were the most appropriate materials for fabricating automobile bumpers.…”