2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landmark analysis to adjust for immortal time bias in oncology studies using claims data linked to death data

Abstract: that vildagliptin 50 mg bid and sitagliptin 100 mg qd are equivalent is 99.3%. The result of a sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of the two drugs remaining equivalent remains high (>90%) over a wide range of MCIDs. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative method has the potential to improve understanding of equivalence (or non-inferiority) between drugs for multiple stake-holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike traditional survival analysis approaches (e.g., Kaplan Meier), landmark analysis accounts for the time elapsed since the initial surgery, as well as for the occurrence of intervening events such as recurrence. 12 As expected, several traditional factors (e.g., tumor size, margin status, tumor grade 3 or 4, AJCC T and N categories) were associated with prognosis, and the impact of these variables on survival were noted to vary over time. Thus, we developed a tool predicting the probability of OS at various times after resection accounting for intervening events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike traditional survival analysis approaches (e.g., Kaplan Meier), landmark analysis accounts for the time elapsed since the initial surgery, as well as for the occurrence of intervening events such as recurrence. 12 As expected, several traditional factors (e.g., tumor size, margin status, tumor grade 3 or 4, AJCC T and N categories) were associated with prognosis, and the impact of these variables on survival were noted to vary over time. Thus, we developed a tool predicting the probability of OS at various times after resection accounting for intervening events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…11 Landmark analysis splits the follow-up time at a common, prespecified time point, the so-called ''landmark.'' 12 In turn, landmark analysis allows for a more dynamic prediction of survival that accounts for the time elapsed since the initial surgery, as well as the occurrence of intervening events such as recurrence. The current study aimed to develop a dynamic prognostic model for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for ICC using landmark analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before 2014, only 5% of patients had CLM resection, however after that the frequency increased sharply in 2015, peaking at 19.4% in 2017. To account for immortal time bias, landmark analysis was used to evaluate the impact of hepatic resection on survival 40 . Using a 12-month landmark, the 5-year survival rate for patients who had undergone hepatic metastasis resection was 58.3%, compared with 27.0% for patients without resection; median overall survival for these two groups was 74.3 months (95% CI, 58.5 to 90.0 months) and 32.6 months (95% CI, 30.1 to 35.2 months), respectively with HR of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.0001, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of different groups was performed using the log-rank test; p -value < 0.05 was considered significant. For analysis of the impact of hepatic resection on survival, the length of survival is known to impact the possibility that patients will undergo hepatic resection, thereby inducing a bias in favor of resection using traditional survival methods 40 . Hence, a landmark analysis was used to decrease bias induced by including various events that happens after the baseline hazard models 4 , 62 , 63 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the issue of immortal time bias, a landmark analysis was performed to evaluate the association between treatment delays and OS, with a designated landmark date of 150 days after HCC diagnosis. ( 27 ) In this analysis, patients who died before the designated landmark time and those who received HCC treatment after the landmark were excluded, thus eliminating immortal time bias in the treatment‐delay group. Sensitivity analysis was further conducted with landmark dates of 120 and 180 days after HCC diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%