1985
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.53.6.748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landmarks in computer-assisted psychological assessment.

Abstract: This article traces the history, development, and rationale of computer-based test interpretation (CBTI). Early systems were developed to meet practical needs. Developments in computer technology permitted a progression from mail-in services to on-line interactive testing. This article presents a taxonomy of CBTI systems, reviews recurring issues, and evaluates the extent to which the goals of the early system developers were achieved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A psychology technician trained to oversee the evaluation process ensured that subjects did not fatigue and that they understood the self-report items. Computer methodologies appear to be particularly useful for assessing sensitive topics (Fowler, 1985). In individuals characterized by schizotypal features such as excessive social anxiety and paranoid ideation, computer assessment may remove some of the interpersonal concerns or barriers to accurate self-disclosure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A psychology technician trained to oversee the evaluation process ensured that subjects did not fatigue and that they understood the self-report items. Computer methodologies appear to be particularly useful for assessing sensitive topics (Fowler, 1985). In individuals characterized by schizotypal features such as excessive social anxiety and paranoid ideation, computer assessment may remove some of the interpersonal concerns or barriers to accurate self-disclosure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program encourages editing its draft reports and merging them with other test and interview data. This is intended to safeguard against uncritical acceptance by inadequately trained professionals who fail to recognize the limitations of computer-generated material [8][9][10][11][12]. This is consistent with guidelines issued by the American Psychological Association, as well as current assessment practices and conclusions from a review of the validity of computer-generated reports [13][14][15].…”
Section: Target Audiencementioning
confidence: 59%
“…All measures were administered and scored by computer under the supervision of a trained examiner. Computerized administration of psychological measures has been found to compare favorably with pen-and-pencil methods (Wilson et al, 1985) and may be particularly useful when assessing sensitive topics such as suicidality (Erdman et al, 1987;Fowler, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%