2018
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2017-518
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape analysis of soil methane flux across complex terrain

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant net CH 4 emissions, mostly found in the valley bottom and the groundwater discharge zone (Figure 7 and Table S1), were positively correlated with soil water content, suggesting that anaerobic condition supports CH 4 production by methanogens at a rate exceeding the CH 4 oxidation capacity of the surface soils (Conrad, 1996;Le Mer & Roger, 2001). This suggests a dominant role of lower landscape positions in the catchment for net CH 4 production, similar to what has been found for wetlands and riparian zones (Jungkunst et al, 2008;Kaiser et al, 2018;MacDonald et al, 1998). The much higher CH 4 emission in the groundwater discharge zone than in the valley bottom (Figures 2a, 3, and 4) could be attributed to differences in anaerobic soil volume controlled by soil WFPS (Figure 1) and groundwater table (Figures 2d and S5).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciencessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Significant net CH 4 emissions, mostly found in the valley bottom and the groundwater discharge zone (Figure 7 and Table S1), were positively correlated with soil water content, suggesting that anaerobic condition supports CH 4 production by methanogens at a rate exceeding the CH 4 oxidation capacity of the surface soils (Conrad, 1996;Le Mer & Roger, 2001). This suggests a dominant role of lower landscape positions in the catchment for net CH 4 production, similar to what has been found for wetlands and riparian zones (Jungkunst et al, 2008;Kaiser et al, 2018;MacDonald et al, 1998). The much higher CH 4 emission in the groundwater discharge zone than in the valley bottom (Figures 2a, 3, and 4) could be attributed to differences in anaerobic soil volume controlled by soil WFPS (Figure 1) and groundwater table (Figures 2d and S5).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciencessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…At TSP forest, soils in the groundwater discharge zone emit on average 7,000 μg CH 4 -C·m −2 ·hr −1 (Figure 3), which is within the range of global averages for wetland CH 4 emissions (Turetsky et al, 2014). However, this CH 4 emission is higher than the values reported for riparian soils in temperate (Itoh et al, 2009;Kaiser et al, 2018;Warner et al, 2018) and tropical forests (O'Connell et al, 2018). This may be related to the high groundwater tables during monsoonal summer at our site (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciencessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When there is a lack of prior knowledge in the relevant fields of sample data, the radial basis kernel function is generally selected as the kernel function, which can better balance the fitting effect and generalization ability than other kernel functions [11,12]. e expression of the radial basis kernel function is as follows:…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%