2010
DOI: 10.1179/kiv.2010.76.1.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape and Social Scale at Goodman Point, Hovenweep National Monument, Southwestern Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varien (1999) examined the spatial relationship of contemporaneous large, aggregated community centers and defined three cost km catchments: (1) a 2 cost km radius to capture “intensive cultivation and regular interaction among community members” (155), (2) a 7 cost km radius used to procure wild food and nonfood resources, and (3) an 18 cost km radius identifying the maximum extent of regular round trip travel by a household to a community center for religious and economic activity. Recent literature has primarily focused on the 2 cost km extent to assess social relationships in the upland U.S. Southwest (Bernardini and Peeples 2015; Coffey 2010; Crabtree 2015; Hill et al 2015; Lipe and Ortman 2000; Mahoney et al 2000; Murrell and Unruh 2016; Varien and Potter 2008). This catchment size is useful for understanding potential social relationships that existed between clusters of households, but the measurement is a necessarily static number representing what was inevitably a dynamic process (Schachner 2015).…”
Section: Community In the Mesa Verde Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varien (1999) examined the spatial relationship of contemporaneous large, aggregated community centers and defined three cost km catchments: (1) a 2 cost km radius to capture “intensive cultivation and regular interaction among community members” (155), (2) a 7 cost km radius used to procure wild food and nonfood resources, and (3) an 18 cost km radius identifying the maximum extent of regular round trip travel by a household to a community center for religious and economic activity. Recent literature has primarily focused on the 2 cost km extent to assess social relationships in the upland U.S. Southwest (Bernardini and Peeples 2015; Coffey 2010; Crabtree 2015; Hill et al 2015; Lipe and Ortman 2000; Mahoney et al 2000; Murrell and Unruh 2016; Varien and Potter 2008). This catchment size is useful for understanding potential social relationships that existed between clusters of households, but the measurement is a necessarily static number representing what was inevitably a dynamic process (Schachner 2015).…”
Section: Community In the Mesa Verde Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average Theissen polygon area for great kivas was 80 km², less than half of the same area for great kivas constructed during the Pueblo I period. This is likely due, in part, to an increased population concentrating in parts of the study area near productive agricultural land; however the close spacing of great kivas likely also reflects increased inter-community ties that were historically and/or opportunistically situated (Coffey, 2010;Lipe, 2002;Varien et al, 2007). The reduction in space between structures during the early Pueblo II period indicates groups and local leaders were coming into close contact, perhaps expressing the need to compete with others for influence at the local level.…”
Section: Late Pueblo II (Ad 1060 To 1140)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adler and Varien (1994) and Coffey et al (2011) have identified this vicinity as a small community, integrated through the Harlan Great Kiva. However, more recent research by Coffey andCopeland (2009, 2011) have suggested that prior to A.D. 1250, the Harlan Great Kiva may have actually been a smaller structure, possibly a pit structure. This would not suggest that there was no organization within the area.…”
Section: Casa Negra-shields Roadmentioning
confidence: 99%