2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape based forest management, a real world case study from Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The examples provided also indicate that a logical and realistic hierarchy in forest planning (Baskent & Keles 2005, Mairota & Piussi 2009), coupled with (i) the operational incorporation of landscape ecological principles and spatial objectives (Kurttila 2001, Mendoza et al 2005, and (ii) collective resource management programs (sensu Pretty 2003), is both necessary and a promising way to reach a balance between economic and environmental sustainability. It is also crucial to the creation of short wood-energy supply chains in rural-mountain areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The examples provided also indicate that a logical and realistic hierarchy in forest planning (Baskent & Keles 2005, Mairota & Piussi 2009), coupled with (i) the operational incorporation of landscape ecological principles and spatial objectives (Kurttila 2001, Mendoza et al 2005, and (ii) collective resource management programs (sensu Pretty 2003), is both necessary and a promising way to reach a balance between economic and environmental sustainability. It is also crucial to the creation of short wood-energy supply chains in rural-mountain areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this regard, Kurttila (2001) provides a review of forest plans where spatial objectives have been integrated into forest planning. Mendoza et al (2005) described a forest plan designed following landscape ecological principles in which silvicultural treatments were planned to accelerate spatial diversification and establish late successional conditions. Chen et al (2008) identified and discussed the main components and challenges in landscape ecological studies with an emphasis on how they relate to forest management.…”
Section: Ecological Planning and Management Of Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has now reached a stage of maturity that principles and models can be applied with confidence in real cases (Kurttila 2001, Mendoza et al 2005, Suzuki & Olson 2008. A growing number of agencies and organizations worldwide are now embracing integrated approaches to plan and manage landscapes with a goal to maintain the sustainability and diverse ecosystem services offered by landscapes (de Groot et al 2002, Bunker et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Words such as "community" and "diversity", shown as examples in Figure 2B, or "disturbance", "habitat" and "sustainable" took off in the mid-1990s, i.e., shortly after the Earth Summit in 1992. "Landscape" and "forest-landscape" mirror the upsurge of landscape ecology as a theoretical foundation for the sustainable forest management (Mendoza et al, 2005;Schlaepfer, 1997). "Spatial", "local", "pattern", "long-term" exemplify issues related to spatial and temporal scales, which are critical when quantifying landscape or stand heterogeneity.…”
Section: Winnersmentioning
confidence: 99%