“…This hypothesis is supported by the presence of different species that predominate in different environments or that can alternate between open and closed environments, and vice versa. This is the type of landscape suggested by the pollen analyses carried out in different points of the CTB, pine forest and local forest with Mediterranean taxa (evergreen type Quercus and Oleaceae), Mesophilic (Betula, Castanea, Corylus and evergreen type Quercus), riverside woodland (Alnus, Salix and Ulmus), several types of thicket (Ericaceae, Rosaceae and Cistaceae), herbaceous (Asteraceae, Poaceae and Chenopodiaceae) and continuous presence-although in low percentages-of aquatic taxa (Cyperaceae, Epilobium, Juncaceae, Myryophillum, Nymphaceae, Ranunculaceade and Typha) (Gil-García et al 2019), which fit in the palaeoenvironmental demands considered typical of the species identified among the small mammals, Erinaceus europaeus, Crocidura russula, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Eliomys quercinus, Apodemus sp., Cricetulus (Allocricetus) bursae, Arvicola aff. sapidus, Microtus cabrerae and Microtus duodecimcostatus (Sesé et al 2011a, b) and the herpetofauna, with toads (Pelobates cultripes, Bufo bufo, Bufo calamita), frogs (Pelophylax perezi), turtles, lacertid (Timon lepidus, Psamamodromus cf.…”