2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape, facilities and visitors: An integrated model of recreational ecosystem services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that there is a high proportion of values found near roads does not mean that roads increase nature values. As shown by Kulczyk, Woźniak, and Derek (2018), the distribution of values can be locally affected by infrastructure despite nature being the true attraction in the region. Such data will not fully capture the fine‐scale distribution of nature qualities that are appreciated in landscapes more distant from roads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that there is a high proportion of values found near roads does not mean that roads increase nature values. As shown by Kulczyk, Woźniak, and Derek (2018), the distribution of values can be locally affected by infrastructure despite nature being the true attraction in the region. Such data will not fully capture the fine‐scale distribution of nature qualities that are appreciated in landscapes more distant from roads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key aspect in which the proposed methodology supports the design of planning actions is the explicit distinction between potential and actual opportunities for nature-based recreation. Highlighting the role of facilities and infrastructures to access and to use the areas as a pre-requisite to realize the recreation potential is coherent with studies about recreation in both urban parks and extra-urban areas [43,67,80], and limits causal assumptions that link the presence of green spaces to their use for recreation, which proved to be largely unfounded [81]. Discriminating whether scarce opportunities for nature-based recreation are the consequence of a low recreation potential or the result of scarce availability of facilities and infrastructures supports the selection of appropriate planning and management interventions.…”
Section: How the Assessment Of Nature-based Recreation Can Support Urmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To overcome these limitations, innovative approaches and methods analyzing nature-based recreation from an ecosystem service perspective have been recently developed and applied in a variety of contexts [36][37][38], including urban areas [32,[39][40][41]. These methods assess nature-based recreation considering both the supply, which depends on the potential of different green spaces based on their typology and conditions, and the demand for the service, which depends on the context-specific preferences of the local population [42,43]. Despite their growing popularity, the improvements potentially brought to urban planning decisions with respect to other, more common approaches and indicators, are yet to be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if there are several lakes close to each other, they may allow for multiple uses in a spatially separated layout, e.g., recreation and nature conservation. Good design and management (considered guidance, smart location, and infrastructure development, particularly access roads and exceptionally attractive recreational facilities) allow for directing activities and managing intensity of use [119].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%