Landscape in Participatory Processes: Tools for Stimulating Debate on Landscape Issues?

Public participation in landscape planning: Effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway

“…As these photos were targeted specifically towards youths, they do not play the same role as methods where visual representations constitute the basis for broad landscape evaluations and decision-making. In the examples from Europe there are several methods which emphasize visual representations of the landscape at stake, such as 3D simulations, scenario development, and sketching (Michelin et al, 2011;Planchat-Héry, 2011). A possible reason for this difference may be that Norwegian spatial planning to a large degree focusses on zoning of areas in question, and the different zones carry different restrictions and possibilities.…”

“…Visual aids include sketches, 3D illustrations, photos and maps, and often include scenario presentations. Such methods are described by Michelin et al (2011) andPlanchat-Héry (2011). Visual aids are intended to stimulate discussion.…”

Using the connoisseur method during the introductory phase of landscape planning and management

“…Michelin et al (2011), relating their experiences working with participatory processes in landscape development, praise the benefit that may be achieved, but caution the methods that are narrowly focused on the local context and limited to the perspective of local inhabitants risk losing visionary insight by becoming too down to earth and practical.…”

Mapping Landscape Values and Conflicts through the Optics of Different User Groups

“…The importance of a meaningful dialogue and active field surveys during participative planning is emphasized by Clemetsen et al [18] and the use of verbal methods when resolving issues in the landscape in the form of meetings and discussions are also recommended by Larsson et al [19]. Visual aids, such as drawings, 3D illustrations, photographs and maps, as well as the presentation of scenarios, as described by Michelin et al [20], are also often suitable for stimulating discussion. Ramos [21] combines visual and written verbal aids when describing future aspirations and scenarios.…”