2021
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape‐level vegetation conversion and biodiversity improvement after 33 years of restoration management in the Drentsche Aa brook valley

Abstract: The following full text is a publisher's version.For additional information about this publication click this link. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/246432Please be advised that this information was generated on 2022-07-25 and may be subject to change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). The Drentse Aa is a 30 km 2 stream valley that has had a long history of agricultural exploitation with high levels of nutrient amendments and large alterations in the hydrological functioning of the Drentsche Aa stream and its tributaries, amongst which the Anlooer Diepje brooklet ( Liu et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 ). The Drentse Aa is a 30 km 2 stream valley that has had a long history of agricultural exploitation with high levels of nutrient amendments and large alterations in the hydrological functioning of the Drentsche Aa stream and its tributaries, amongst which the Anlooer Diepje brooklet ( Liu et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling plots were situated in the valley of the brooklet "Anlooer" Diepje, a much intact natural stream that forms part of the stream-valley system "Drentsche Aa," which is situated in the north-eastern part of the Netherlands in the Province of Drenthe ( Liu et al 2021 ). The fields surrounding the brooklet mainly consist of grasslands on loamy sand with a slightly acidic pH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses are experiential, which can be physically or measured, economically valued, subjectively scored, or even evaluated by manual designed indicators. Many physical responses from vegetation change are spatially explicit, for example: the increase in terrestrial carbon sink (Lu et al, 2022); the shrinkage of water yield (Wang et al, 2021b); the change in remote benefits from wind erosion prevention and water erosion prevention (Hu et al, 2022; Thomaz et al, 2022); the change in ecohydrological processes such as water use efficiency (Ding et al, 2021; Shao et al, 2022); the gain of nutrient removal by marsh vegetation near cultivated land (Liu et al, 2022a); and the promotion in microclimatic conditions by the hydrologic cycle from the surrounding landscape (Cheng et al, 2022; Peng et al, 2022a). The livelihood responses to landscape restoration are also spatiotemporally different.…”
Section: The Response Of Geographical Processes To Landscape Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to highlight that in our experiment, the water table was kept constant above the peat surface to generate anoxic conditions and mimicked extended summer flooding. In the field, not all rewetted peatlands will experience prolonged and continuous summer flooding due to the lack of irrigation infrastructure or water availability (Liu et al 2020;Oestmann et al 2022). In that light, water levels in field conditions may lead to different GHG emission dynamics (Koebsch et al 2020), because water table fluctuations may affect oxidation and reduction processes by either stimulating CH 4 production or oxidation (Estop-Aragonés and Blodau 2012; Koebsch et al 2020).…”
Section: Challenges For Scaling Up Tsr For Peatland Rewettingmentioning
confidence: 99%