2018
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape of knowledge sciences in JASIST

Abstract: This poster describes a research project in progress to map the historical and current published and grey literature of the field of knowledge management/knowledge sciences. The research describes the mapping of 11,820 JASIS papers to the landscape of knowledge sciences. The mapping is grounded on the automated classification and automated indexing of the individual papers leveraging a semantic profile and the SAS Content Categorization Suite. The semantic profile was created from the knowledge sciences classi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that one of the newly discovered papers that was omitted by Serenko (2013) (Torugsa and O'Donohue, 2016), the role of library and information science (LIS) in KM (Agarwal and Islam, 2018), KM in franchising (Iddy and Alon, 2019), process capital (Matthies, 2014), knowledge commercialization (Biranvand et al, 2017), and knowledge sharing, exchange and transfer (Chou and Tang, 2014). In total, 11% of studies were conducted in the context of a single journal or conference (Barik and Jena, 2013) using both KM and non-KM outlets (Bedford and Bekbalaeva, 2018;Potgieter, 2018). A smaller fraction of the projects (3%) was done in the context of specific countries or regions, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that one of the newly discovered papers that was omitted by Serenko (2013) (Torugsa and O'Donohue, 2016), the role of library and information science (LIS) in KM (Agarwal and Islam, 2018), KM in franchising (Iddy and Alon, 2019), process capital (Matthies, 2014), knowledge commercialization (Biranvand et al, 2017), and knowledge sharing, exchange and transfer (Chou and Tang, 2014). In total, 11% of studies were conducted in the context of a single journal or conference (Barik and Jena, 2013) using both KM and non-KM outlets (Bedford and Bekbalaeva, 2018;Potgieter, 2018). A smaller fraction of the projects (3%) was done in the context of specific countries or regions, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%