The European Landscape Convention's (ELC) definition of landscape, "an area, as perceived by people…" places the public central to any understanding of landscape. This paper argues for 'just' involvement of the public and looks at how the focus of landscape as a perceived entity has been taken up within Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), an approach applied in the England and Scotland for implementing the ELC. Based on a conceptual framework grounded in perception as a phenomenological experience of landscape and informed by principles of participation, LCA's from 2007 to 2011 have been assessed as to how public involvement has been considered. The results show that only a quarter of all assessments accessed involved the public, and that among these there is great disparity in the degree to which the public is engaged.
IntroductionLandscape has been referred to as an integrating, holistic concept, which provides common ground for diverse disciplines and actors to address shared problems (Tress et al., 2003;Naveh, 2001;Fry, 2001). Yet the concept landscape is situated in an increasingly complex social and economic context. Building on Castells' thesis of the 'Information age' it has been noted that shared values diminish, and that conflict and tension heightens as the diversity of values increases (Healey, 1996;Innes, 2003; Tress et 1 al., 2003). Competing values are seen as being founded on technical advances, increased mobility and contact between diverse cultures. Landscape can be considered one of the arenas where these contested values can create conflict, as a diversity of users and the interests they bring with them vie for limited resources.The significance of landscape for the well-being of individuals and society is well recognised (Luginbűhl, 2006; EEA, 2007) as is the implication of quality of place for attracting local businesses and population into competing urban regions (Selman, 2006). At odds with this realisation of the benefits of landscape as a resource is the frequently commented perception of deterioration of the landscape across Europe (Buchecker et al, 2003).It is within this context that the European Landscape Convention (ELC) was conceived. As the first regional international treaty concerning landscape (Prieur, 2006), the ELC sits under the auspices of the Council of Europe (CoE). As such the convention can be seen as a tool to forward the CoE's objectives for democracy, extension of human rights, and raising awareness of European cultural identity and diversity (CoE, 2011).Unlike the European Union or European Commission, the work of the CoE does not constitute law nor represent the power of the state but can be viewed as more of a "moral authority" (Olwig, 2007). This position allows individual signatory states to choose the means to fulfil the obligations of the convention from within their own legal system and national planning traditions (Prieur, 2006). In such a way the aim of the Convention is not to develop a new order within landscape dictated from Europe, but t...