Landscape reveals critical network structures for sharpening gene expression boundaries

Abstract

BackgroundSpatial pattern formation is a critical issue in developmental biology. Gene expression boundary sharpening has been observed from both experiments and modeling simulations. However, the mechanism to determine the sharpness of the boundary is not fully elucidated.ResultsWe investigated the boundary sharpening resulted by three biological motifs, interacting with morphogens, and uncovered their probabilistic landscapes. The landscape view, along with calculated average switching time between attractors, provides a natural explanation for the boundary sharpening behavior relying on the noise induced gene state switchings. To possess boundary sharpening potential, a gene network needs to generate an asymmetric bistable state, i.e. one of the two stable states is less stable than the other. We found that the mutual repressed self-activation model displays more robust boundary sharpening ability against parameter perturbation, compared to the mutual repression or the self-activation model. This is supported by the results of switching time calculated from the landscape, which indicate that the mutual repressed self-activation model has shortest switching time, among three models. Additionally, introducing cross gradients of morphogens provides a more stable mechanism for the boundary sharpening of gene expression, due to a two-way switching mechanism.ConclusionsOur results reveal the underlying principle for the gene expression boundary sharpening, and pave the way for the mechanistic understanding of cell fate decisions in the pattern formation processes of development.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12918-018-0595-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

FGF Gradient Controls Boundary Position Between Proliferating and Differentiating Cells and Regulates Lacrimal Gland Growth Dynamics

“…Our study suggests that different patterns of morphogenetic changes observed in the explants exposed to different FGFs is due to changes in the position of the boundary between proliferating and differentiating parts of the epithelial explant. The boundary position is determined by the decrease/loss of ERK1/2 activation between the “stalks” and “buds.” Similar concept of boundaries between gene expression domains could be implied to different tissues and is central to many developmental processes (Cottrell et al, 2012; Caggiano et al, 2017; Neijts and Deschamps, 2017; Li et al, 2018). For example Sawada and coauthors (Sawada et al, 2001) showed that FGF/MAPK signaling is a crucial positional cue in somite boundary formation.…”

Noise control and utility: From regulatory network to spatial patterning

“…Many theoretical works have devoted to study the boundary sharpening process. By utilizing energy landscape, functions of each gene regulation in this system were demonstrated [86]. Also an increase level of noise allows switching more rapidly, but increases the rate of spontaneous switching and thereby decreases the precision of gene expression boundary [87].…”

A stochastic model of homeostasis: The roles of noise and nuclear positioning in deciding cell fate

“…In the model ( Serbanescu et al., 2020 ), it has observed that cell size variability depends on the balance between ribosomes and division protein which depends on nutrient availability. Gene expression boundary sharpening controlled by morphogens shows that mutual repressed self-activation network is more robust than others against parameter perturbation ( Li et al., 2018 ). A noise-driven cell differentiation model ( Safdari et al., 2020 ) that uses a GRN with two mutually inhibiting transcription factors shows an increasing number of differentiated cells as division plane deviate from center of the cell.…”