2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape sequences along the urban–rural–natural gradient: A novel geospatial approach for identification and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The new growth of urban districts was often generated by the elimination of semi-natural areas in satellite cities or suburbs around the existing urban places [5]. Great loss due to high vulnerability of agricultural land was a direct consequence of high-intensity land use, and has been highlighted in previous studies [33,40]. In addition, the constant decrease of AL was partly due to the abandoned farmland which was widespread in Yangtze River delta [9].…”
Section: The Spatiotemporal Pattern Of Landscape Changes Under Rapid mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The new growth of urban districts was often generated by the elimination of semi-natural areas in satellite cities or suburbs around the existing urban places [5]. Great loss due to high vulnerability of agricultural land was a direct consequence of high-intensity land use, and has been highlighted in previous studies [33,40]. In addition, the constant decrease of AL was partly due to the abandoned farmland which was widespread in Yangtze River delta [9].…”
Section: The Spatiotemporal Pattern Of Landscape Changes Under Rapid mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results were consistent with Forman and Godron [38], which stated that along a landscape modification gradient patch density and shape would increase, meanwhile landscape connectivity would decrease with urbanization. The results of LPI implied that the residential and industrial land occupied most portions of landscape area within the rural-urban fringes, where natural landscape were originally dominated by agricultural and green land [33]. Highly mixed landscape emerged in suburbs due not only to the "top-down" forces from urban center, but the "down-top" influences exerted by suburbanization from rural industrialization as well [39].…”
Section: The Spatiotemporal Pattern Of Landscape Changes Under Rapid mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the urban fringe to the south has a lower MPS for agricultural land than in the north and east; and that the difference is due to the high frequency of vineyards in the south compared to the dominance of dryland cereal fields in the north, and extensive grazing areas and fruit orchards in the east. Furthermore, this method can be used to understand the influences of regional towns on land-use transitions-a point that is rarely considered in peri-urban studies [48]. For example, in the southern transect, the influence of the town of Victor Harbor on land fragmentation and land-use changes near the end of the transect is clear in comparison to the other two transects.…”
Section: Land Structure Analysis Along Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data reveal the importance of quantifying the individual land-use class measurements to identify the detailed land structure elements in these complex landscapes. Vizzari and Sigura [48] argue that whole gradient analysis is required in rural-to-urban analyses. Urban expansion in Australian cities occurs in less complex landscapes than those in world regions chararcterised by high levels of urbanization or rapid urbanization and unprecedented levels of development in tangled webs of complex rural-urban transitions [10], e.g., Japan, eastern China, south-east Asia, western Europe, and parts of North America.…”
Section: Agricultural Land In the Areas Of Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%