Landscapes Shaped by People and Place Institutions Require a New Conservation Agenda

Brunckhorst, David J.

doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.2

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La característica primordial e innovadora de este tipo de observatorio es su carácter participativo, lo que implica considerar la participación de todos los grupos de interés en un área, por ejemplo, un área nacional protegida o una comunidad rural que se encuentre enfrentando un reto particular o estén siendo afectados o beneficiados por un proyecto de desarrollo. Sistema socioecológico: Sistemas naturales y sociales como una unidad cuyos componentes se vinculan y retroalimentan (Brunckhorst, 2010). Desde los años noventa se aclara que las relaciones entre el humano y el medioambiente son altamente complejas y se comprenden de fenómenos diversos.…”

Section: Más Informaciónunclassified

“…Por ello, además de que la pérdida de diversidad se debe comprender a través de una evaluación detallada de las interacciones entre una amplia gama de variables sociales, culturales, económicas, políticas y ambientales (Oviedo et al, 2000). Para el entendimiento de los sistemas se examinan, monitorean y gestionan los componentes bio-geo-físicos naturales y los componentes sociales y culturales simultáneamente, borrando así las fronteras disciplinarias entre lo ecológico y lo social (Brunckhorst, 2010). Los sse son complejos y adaptativos en respuesta a cambios abruptos, turbulentos o inesperados.…”

Section: Más Informaciónunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Zonas áridas de México: construcción de comunidades de aprendizaje

Martínez-Tagüeña,

Huber‑Sannwald,

Reyes Gómez

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esta publicación no sólo ofrece una visión teórica y conceptual, sino también una guía práctica sobre cómo establecer un OPSE. Te equipa con las herramientas necesarias para formar alianzas, comprender la caracterización socioecológica del territorio, diseñar actividades específicas y colaborar de manera efectiva. Además, proporciona acceso a fuentes documentales, herramientas y bases de datos a través del Repositorio Participativo del Desierto (https://repositorio.risza.mx), diseñado para apoyar técnicamente el desarrollo de un OPSE. En resumen, este libro es un llamado a la acción para unirte a una comunidad global de aprendizaje que lucha por un futuro más sostenible en las zonas áridas. Únete a nosotros y sé parte del cambio que estas regiones necesitan. Tu participación puede marcar la diferencia.

show abstract

Section: Más Informaciónunclassified

Zonas áridas de México: construcción de comunidades de aprendizaje

Martínez-Tagüeña,

Huber‑Sannwald,

Reyes Gómez

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is increasingly recognized that success for landscape approaches depends on governance systems that are nested across levels (Kozar et al 2014, Duguma et al 2015, Minang et al 2015b. Landscape approaches can be thought of as the nesting of community-based natural resource management (Brunckhorst 2010). Aside from the importance of addressing challenges across scales and levels, there is a need for integration of social, economic, and environmental objectives and for integration across sectors, tasks for which conventional governance systems are ill-equipped (Mbow et al 2015).…”

Section: Linkages Governance Landscapesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional linkages and landscape governance systems: the case of Mt. Marsabit, Kenya

Robinson¹,

Kagombe²

2018

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The desire to overcome fragmented management of the natural ecosystems on which human beings depend has contributed to a growing interest in landscape approaches and to deeper questions about landscape governance systems. We assessed the emergent governance system that corresponds to the Mt. Marsabit landscape ecosystem in northern Kenya, applying a framework that includes 17 different indicators. We found that in this governance system, the most important spaces where coordination and joint planning took place were district level coordination committees, within which representation of communities and voices from the grassroots was poor. Institutional and organizational linkages were such that those parts of the governance system for which legitimacy and accountability were strongest were the parts for which ability to generate resources was weakest, while the parts of the governance system that had the best access to resources was where accountability was weakest or the most indirect. In this paper we use the Mt. Marsabit case study to explore the role that organizational and institutional linkages play in the strengths and weaknesses of landscape governance systems, and consider the implications for governance design at landscape level. Institutional linkages play a critical role in determining how landscape governance systems function across scales and levels, and their degree of fit. Appropriate linkages can help to create connections among key dimensions of effective governance within the system, dimensions such as use of knowledge, capacity to generate resources, fit, learning, legitimacy, accountability, and responsiveness, strengthening the system as a whole. Of the various linkages that characterize a governance system, it is those that give community-level actors a meaningful voice at higher levels and in spaces where key decisions are being made that are most critical for enabling effective landscape governance.

show abstract