2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:nhaz.0000020264.70048.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide and Tsunami 21 November 2000 in Paatuut, West Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). According to Dahl−Jensen et al (2004) the direct cause was melting and refreezing of water in surface cracks due to air temperature fluctuations during the days prior to the event. After several days with cold temperatures and some snowfall the temperature rose to 5 to 6°C for two days, causing some snow melt, followed by temperatures just below freezing on the 20th and 21st of November 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). According to Dahl−Jensen et al (2004) the direct cause was melting and refreezing of water in surface cracks due to air temperature fluctuations during the days prior to the event. After several days with cold temperatures and some snowfall the temperature rose to 5 to 6°C for two days, causing some snow melt, followed by temperatures just below freezing on the 20th and 21st of November 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunami generated dam− age was described by local authorities from sites as much as 180 km from Paatuut. Anomalous weather conditions, notably warming followed by cooling that caused water freezing in cracks during the days prior to the slide are thought to have caused failure of the steep mountain side (Dahl−Jensen et al 2004). Although rock avalanches and landslides are common in the area, the size of the tsunami was con− sidered to be the largest during at least the last 500 years (Dahl−Jensen et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographs taken after the event indicate a dark stripe along the coast where low-lying snow, below about 50 m asl, was washed away by the tsunami. Locally the resulting tsunami had a height of 50 m. Several icebergs were washed inland and stranded 300-700 m from the coast, with debris (sediment and icebergs) scattered across an alluvial fan up to 800 m. The tsunami was the largest reported in Vaigat during at least the last 500 years and field observations show the impact of the event was limited to the U-shaped Vaigat fjord [15]. Buchwal et al [12] suggest that climatic factors likely had a role in influencing the event, with the highest precipitation and thickest permafrost active layer on record observed in the months leading up to the event.…”
Section: Tsunami Hazard In Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) noted abnormal waves in the harbour. A subsequent survey by Pedersen et al [49] and Dahl-Jensen et al [15] revealed that the waves were caused by a landslide that entered the sea c. 40 km northwest at Paattut. The escarpment that failed at the head of the slide reached c. 1400 m above sea level (asl), delivering an estimated 30 million m 3 of sediment into the sea.…”
Section: Tsunami Hazard In Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation