Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring III 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2531695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide detection with ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 data using convolutional neural networks: a case study of 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Snow is a potential source of error when using SAR in landslide detection. There is a strong difference in SAR backscattering properties between wet snow, dry snow and no snow (Koskinen et al, 1997). As such, decreased coherence can be caused by snowmelt, drift or fall between image acquisitions.…”
Section: Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Snow is a potential source of error when using SAR in landslide detection. There is a strong difference in SAR backscattering properties between wet snow, dry snow and no snow (Koskinen et al, 1997). As such, decreased coherence can be caused by snowmelt, drift or fall between image acquisitions.…”
Section: Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the exception of Mondini et al (2019), who used a global selection of landslides, these studies are generally tested on a single landslide event and use a single radar sensor. For example, Aimaiti et al (2019), Konishi and Suga (2019), Jung and Yun (2019), and Yamaguchi et al (2019) tested their methods using ALOS-2 imagery of the 2018 Hokkaido earthquake. If such methods are to be applied in future events, wider testing is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is to estimate landslide locations based on their signal in satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, which can be acquired through cloud cover and so is often able to provide more complete spatial coverage than optical satellite imagery in the critical 2-week response window (e.g. Aimaiti et al, 2019;Burrows et al, 2019Burrows et al, , 2020Jung and Yun, 2019;Konishi and Suga, 2019;Mondini et al, 2019Mondini et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ground shaking estimates, and a model is produced that predicts landslide likelihood based on these inputs. A range of methods have been used to generate landslide susceptibility models, including fuzzy logic (Kirschbaum and Stanley, 2018;Kritikos et al, 2015;Robinson et al, 2017), logistic regression (Cui et al, 2020;Nowicki Jessee et al, 2018;Tanyas et al, 2019) and random forests (Catani et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2017;Fan et al, 2020). When generating a susceptibility map for emergency response, the training dataset can be either a collection of landslide inventories triggered by multiple earthquakes worldwide (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation