2011
DOI: 10.17265/1934-7359/2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide Monitoring Using Low Cost GNSS Equipment – Experiences from Two Alpine Testing Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This restricts the possibility of its application to institutions that can afford it and reduces the number of permanent stations that can be built, with a correspondent decrease in the efficiency of the monitoring system. In recent years, however, the attention of the GNSS community has been drawn to the possible application of low-cost GNSS receivers, which for such small networks might be capable of producing useful results (Heunecke et al 2011;Buchli et al 2012;Benoit et al 2014;Cina and Piras 2014). For this reason, the authors of this paper have started studying the problem to show that the approach can be very advantageous from an economic standpoint when low-cost receivers are used and an inexpensive (or even free) open-source software package is applied to build an authentic low-cost monitoring system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restricts the possibility of its application to institutions that can afford it and reduces the number of permanent stations that can be built, with a correspondent decrease in the efficiency of the monitoring system. In recent years, however, the attention of the GNSS community has been drawn to the possible application of low-cost GNSS receivers, which for such small networks might be capable of producing useful results (Heunecke et al 2011;Buchli et al 2012;Benoit et al 2014;Cina and Piras 2014). For this reason, the authors of this paper have started studying the problem to show that the approach can be very advantageous from an economic standpoint when low-cost receivers are used and an inexpensive (or even free) open-source software package is applied to build an authentic low-cost monitoring system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the standard deviation for some solutions was particularly high (e.g., 0.249 m for the N coordinate in 2022), showing that there were some outliers probably caused by the large distance between BRU1 and UDI2, the average values were only a few centimeters (0.024 m at most for the E coordinate in 2022, the cause of which is probably also related to the reference coordinates). Considering that the recommended baseline for a GNSS monitoring system is about 5 km [ 25 , 36 , 37 ], these performance test results are encouraging, taking into account the long baseline tested (58 km) and the fact that the solution was obtained with a single-frequency GNSS.…”
Section: Applications Of the Lzer0 Platformmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Whereas the dual-frequency station tracks both L1 and L2 carrier signals, the singlefrequency devices are able to track only the L1 carrier from the GPS satellites. However, their capacity for measuring relative positions reaches centimeter-level repeatability for hourly sessions, and millimeter-level repeatability for daily sessions [27] in the post-processing mode if their data are calculated with respect to a reference station placed at a distance not exceeding 10 km [28]. It is worth noting that all of the movements measured at each station refer to the first measured position (time differencing) and that the differential approach over short baselines allows attenuating or eliminating common-mode errors (such as atmospheric biases, antenna phase center offsets and variations, etc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the staff of CRS installed the station of TOLS (located less than 1.5 km south-east of FUSE, see Figure 1a) to ensure the functioning of the system in the case of unexpected failures at the FUSE station. As we are using single-frequency devices, we had to ensure that we relied on short baselines, i.e., less than 5 km with at least 1 h of data, and on GPS stations located roughly at the same latitude, in order to provide a significative reduction of the measurement errors induced by the troposphere and the ionosphere [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and to ensure centimeter-level accuracy.…”
Section: Managing Tool and The Calculation Of Displacementsmentioning
confidence: 99%